| 1. |
- Borgström, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Archives of osteoporosis. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1862-3514 .- 1862-3522. ; 15:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This report provides an overview and a comparison of the burden and management of fragility fractures in the largest five countries of the European Union plus Sweden (EU6). In 2017, new fragility fractures in the EU6 are estimated at 2.7 million with an associated annual cost of €37.5 billion and a loss of 1.0 million quality-adjusted life years.Osteoporosis is characterized by reduced bone mass and strength, which increases the risk of fragility fractures, which in turn, represent the main consequence of the disease. This report provides an overview and a comparison of the burden and management of fragility fractures in the largest five EU countries and Sweden (designated the EU6).A series of metrics describing the burden and management of fragility fractures were defined by a scientific steering committee. A working group performed the data collection and analysis. Data were collected from current literature, available retrospective data and public sources. Different methods were applied (e.g. standard statistics and health economic modelling), where appropriate, to perform the analysis for each metric.Total fragility fractures in the EU6 are estimated to increase from 2.7 million in 2017 to 3.3 million in 2030; a 23% increase. The resulting annual fracture-related costs (€37.5 billion in 2017) are expected to increase by 27%. An estimated 1.0 million quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were lost in 2017 due to fragility fractures. The current disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) per 1000 individuals age 50years or more were estimated at 21years, which is higher than the estimates for stroke or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The treatment gap (percentage of eligible individuals not receiving treatment with osteoporosis drugs) in the EU6 is estimated to be 73% for women and 63% for men; an increase of 17% since 2010. If all patients who fracture in the EU6 were enrolled into fracture liaison services, at least 19,000 fractures every year might be avoided.Fracture-related burden is expected to increase over the coming decades. Given the substantial treatment gap and proven cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention schemes such as fracture liaison services, urgent action is needed to ensure that all individuals at high risk of fragility fracture are appropriately assessed and treated.
|
|
| 2. |
- Jonsson, Emma, et al.
(författare)
-
Cost and Health Outcomes Patterns in Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation Following Spine Surgery : A Register-Based Study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Neuromodulation. - : Elsevier BV. - 1094-7159 .- 1525-1403. ; 23:5, s. 626-633
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ObjectiveSpinal cord stimulation (SCS), a minimally invasive treatment option for long‐term neuropathic pain, has been shown to be effective in patients with persisting neuropathic pain after spine surgery. However, little is known about the long‐term cost and quality‐of‐life (QoL) patterns in SCS‐treated patients. The aim is to describe the use of SCS, costs, pre‐spine‐surgery and post‐spine‐surgery QoL, and reported pain intensity, in patients who have undergone spine surgery and subsequent SCS implantation. The results will be related to outcome and cost in spine surgery patients in general.Materials and MethodsA research database comprised from six Swedish national and regional registers, and the spine surgery quality‐of‐care register Swespine was utilized. Two cohorts were identified: all patients who had spine surgery (N = 73,765) and patients who had spine surgery and subsequent SCS implantation (N = 239). Costs were analyzed before and after spine surgery for both cohorts, as well as before and after SCS implantation for the second cohort. QoL was explored by estimating patient‐reported outcome measures such as pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index, and EuroQol‐5Dimensions from spine surgery up to five years post–spine surgery.ResultsIn spine surgery patients, mean QoL and pain intensity levels improved following surgery. Patients subsequently treated with SCS had lower reported QoL and higher costs before the initial spine surgery, and spine surgery did not lead to any substantial improvements, however, costs decreased following SCS implantation in these patients.
|
|
| 3. |
- Söreskog, Emma, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of major osteoporotic fracture after first, second and third fracture in Swedish women aged 50 years and older
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Bone. - : Elsevier BV. - 8756-3282 .- 1873-2763. ; 134
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Osteoporosis affects approximately one in five European women and leads to fragility fractures, which result in poor health, social and economic consequences. Fragility fractures are a strong risk factor for subsequent major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), with risk of MOF being elevated in the 1–2 years following an earlier fracture, a concept described as “imminent risk”. This study examines risk of subsequent MOF in patients with one, two or three prior fractures by age and type of fracture. Methods: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, Swedish women aged ≥50 years with ≥1 any clinical fragility fracture between July 1, 2006 and December 31, 2012 were identified from Sweden's National Patient Register. Each patient was age- and sex-matched to three controls without history of fracture. Group 1 women included those with one fragility fracture during the study period; Group 2 included those with two fragility fractures; and Group 3 included those with three fragility fractures. “Index fracture” was defined as the first fracture during the study period for Group 1; the second for Group 2; and the third for Group 3. Patients in each cohort and matched controls were followed for up to 60 months or until subsequent MOF (hip, vertebra, forearm, humerus), death or end of data availability. Results: 231,769 women with at least one fracture were included in the study and therefore constituted Group 1; of these, 39,524 constituted Group 2 and of those, 7656 constituted Group 3. At five years, cumulative incidence of subsequent MOF was higher in patients with a history of fracture as compared to controls (Group 1: 20.7% vs 12.3%; Group 2: 32.0% vs 15.3%). Three-year cumulative incidence for Group 3 was 12.1% (vs 10.7% for controls). After adjusting for baseline covariates, risk of subsequent MOF was highest within 0–24 months following an index fracture, then decreased but remained elevated as compared to controls. Having two prior fractures, vertebral fractures and younger age at time of index fracture were associated with greater relative risk. Conclusions: Women with a history of osteoporotic fracture are at increased risk of subsequent fracture, which is highest during the first 24 months following a fracture. Younger women and those with vertebral fractures are at greatest relative risk, suggesting that treatment should target these patients and be timely enough to impact the period of imminent risk.
|
|
