SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Chubb Daniel) srt2:(2010)"

Sökning: WFRF:(Chubb Daniel) > (2010)

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Chubb, Daniel, et al. (författare)
  • The Efficacy of Clinical Assessment in the Postoperative Monitoring of Free Flaps : A Review of 1140 Consecutive Cases
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963). - 0032-1052 .- 1529-4242. ; 125:4, s. 1157-1166
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: Effective postoperative monitoring of the vascular pedicle to a free flap can potentiate rapid return to the operating room in the setting of compromise, allowing for the potential to salvage the flap. The only ubiquitous method for postoperative monitoring of free flaps is clinical bedside monitoring, but although the use of clinical monitoring may be inferred in large reported series of free flaps, there has been little discussed in the literature of specific clinical outcome measures. Methods: The authors present their experience with 1140 consecutive cases of free tissue transfer and the use of clinical monitoring as a sole method of monitoring, and subgroup analysis of different recipient sites. Results: There were 94 take-backs, four of which had no pedicle compromise (false-positives) and there were four false-negatives. The overall flap salvage rate was 62.8 percent and the false-positive rate was 0.4 percent. Subgroup analyses demonstrated statistically significant differences between recipient sites for the false-positive rates: fewer false-positives with breast reconstruction cases (p < 0.05) and significantly more false-positives in the extremity group (p < 0.05). There was an improved flap salvage rate in cases of venous compromise compared with arterial compromise (69 percent versus 51 percent, p = 0.015). Conclusions: This largest reported series to date provides an outcome-based analysis of postoperative monitoring for free flaps, providing a benchmark standard against which adjunctive monitoring techniques can be compared. Future studies need to be assessed in the context of individual recipient sites, with significant differences in monitoring outcomes between sites.
  •  
2.
  • Rozen, Warren M, et al. (författare)
  • The efficacy of postoperative monitoring : A single surgeon comparison of clinical monitoring and the implantable Doppler probe in 547 consecutive free flaps
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: Microsurgery. - : Wiley. - 0738-1085 .- 1098-2752. ; 30:2, s. 105-110
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Background: An important element in achieving high success rates with free flap surgery has been the use of different techniques for monitoring flaps postoperatively as a means to detecting vascular compromise. Successful monitoring of the vascular pedicle to a flap can potentiate rapid return to theater in the setting of compromise, with the potential to salvage the flap. There is little evidence that any technique offers any advantage over clinical monitoring alone. Methods: A consecutive series of 547 patients from a single plastic surgical unit who underwent a fasciocutaneous free flap operation for breast reconstruction [deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap, superficial interior epigastric artery l flap, or superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap] were included. A comparison was made between the first 426 consecutive patients in whom flap monitoring was performed using clinical monitoring alone and the subsequent 121 patients in whom monitoring was achieved with the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler probe. Outcome measures included flap salvage rate and false-positive rate. Results: There was a strong trend toward improved salvage rates with the implantable Doppler probe compared with clinical monitoring (80% vs. 66%, P = 0.48). When combined with the literature (meta-analysis), the data prove statistically significant (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference between the groups for false-positive rates. Conclusion: Flap monitoring with the implantable Doppler probe can improve flap salvage rates without increasing the rate of false-positive takebacks.
  •  
3.
  • Whitaker, Iain S., et al. (författare)
  • Postoperative Monitoring of Free Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction : A Multicenter Comparison of 398 Flaps Using Clinical Monitoring, Microdialysis, and the Implantable Doppler Probe
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: Journal of reconstructive microsurgery. - : Georg Thieme Verlag KG. - 0743-684X .- 1098-8947. ; 26:6, s. 409-416
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Many techniques for flap monitoring following free tissue transfer have been described; however, there is little evidence that any of these techniques allow for greater rates of flap salvage over clinical monitoring alone. We sought to compare three established monitoring techniques across three experienced microsurgical centers in a comparable cohort of patients. A retrospective, matched cohort study of 398 consecutive free flaps in 347 patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction was undertaken across three institutions during the same 3-year period, with a single form of postoperative monitoring used at each institution: clinical monitoring alone, the Cook-Swartz implantable Doppler probe, or microdialysis. Both objective and subjective measures of efficacy were assessed. Clinical monitoring alone, the implantable Doppler probe, and microdialysis showed statistically similar rates of flap salvage. False-negative rates were also statistically similar (only seen in the clinically monitored group). However, there was a statistically significant increase in false-positive alarms causing needless take-backs to theater in the microdialysis and implantable Doppler arms, p < 0.001. This study did not find any technique superior to clinical monitoring alone. New monitoring technologies should be compared objectively with clinical monitoring as the current standard in postoperative flap monitoring.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy