| 51. |
- Glimelius, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Metastatic colorectal cancer : Current treatment and future options for improved survival : Medical approach - present status
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0036-5521 .- 1502-7708. ; 47:3, s. 296-314
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background. Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using medical treatments are reviewed. Material and methods. A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence of effects from palliative chemotherapy and targeted drugs was aimed at. Results. The continuous improvements during the past 20-25 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered three lines of chemotherapy with or without a targeted drug based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival in trials has gradually improved from about 6 months to above 24 months in the most recent trials. Survival in the populations has, however, not improved to the same extent. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients, and socioeconomic issues. Integration of surgery and other local methods have further improved outcome for some individuals, but must be fine-tuned. Conclusions. Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. A multi-professional approach and future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.
|
|
| 52. |
- Glimelius, Bengt
(författare)
-
Multidisciplinary treatment of patients with rectal cancer : Development during the past decades and plans for the future
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences. - : Uppsala Medical Society. - 0300-9734 .- 2000-1967. ; 117:2, s. 225-236
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In rectal cancer treatment, both the local primary and the regional and systemic tumour cell deposits must be taken care of in order to improve survival. The three main treatments, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, each with their own advantages and limitations, must then be combined to improve results. Several large randomized trials have shown that combinations of the modalities have markedly reduced the loco-regional recurrences, but have not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals), is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, treatment of rectal cancer is administered to populations of individuals, based upon clinical factors and imaging, and can presently not be further individualized. There is an urgent need to develop response predictors.
|
|
| 53. |
- Glimelius, Bengt
(författare)
-
Neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in rectal cancer
- 2013
-
Ingår i: World Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.. - 1007-9327 .- 2219-2840. ; 19:46, s. 8489-8501
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In rectal cancer treatment, attention has focused on the local primary tumour and the regional tumour cell deposits to diminish the risk of a loco-regional recurrence. Several large randomized trials have also shown that combinations of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy have markedly reduced the risk of a loco-regional recurrence, but this has not yet had any major influence on overall survival. The best results have been achieved when the radiotherapy has been given preoperatively. Preoperative radiotherapy improves loco-regional control even when surgery has been optimized to improve lateral clearance, i.e., when a total mesorectal excision has been performed. The relative reduction is then 50%-70%. The value of radiotherapy has not been tested in combination with more extensive surgery including lateral lymph node clearance, as practised in some Asian countries. Many details about how the radiotherapy is performed are still open for discussion, and practice varies between countries. A highly fractionated radiation schedule (5 Gy x 5), proven efficacious in many trials, has gained much popularity in some countries, whereas a conventionally fractionated regimen (1.8-2.0 Gy x 25-28), often combined with chemotherapy, is used in other countries. The additional therapy adds morbidity to the morbidity that surgery causes, and should therefore be administered only when the risk of loco-regional recurrence is sufficiently high. The best integration of the weakest modality, to date the drugs (conventional cytotoxics and biologicals) is not known. A new generation of trials exploring the best sequence of treatments is required. Furthermore, there is a great need to develop predictors of response, so that treatment can be further individualized and not solely based upon clinical factors and anatomic imaging.
|
|
| 54. |
- Glimelius, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Prediction of irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil toxicity and response in patients with advanced colorectal cancer
- 2011
-
Ingår i: The Pharmacogenomics Journal. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1470-269X .- 1473-1150. ; 11:1, s. 61-71
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) are used to treat metastatic colorectal cancer. Irinotecan's active metabolite is inactivated by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1), which is deficient in Gilbert's syndrome. Irinotecan and metabolites are transported by P-glycoprotein, encoded by ABCB1. 5-FU targets folate metabolism through inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TYMS). Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) generates active folate necessary for haematopoiesis. We retrospectively genotyped 140 Swedish and Norwegian irinotecan and 5-FU-treated colorectal cancer patients from the Nordic VI clinical trial for selected variants of UGT1A1, ABCB1, TYMS and MTHFR. We found an increased risk of clinically relevant early toxicity in patients carrying the ABCB1 3435 T/T genotype, Odds ratio (OR)=3.79 (95% confidence interval (CI)=1.09-13.2), and in patients carrying the UGT1A1(*)28/(*)28 genotype, OR=4.43 (95% CI=1.30-15.2). Patients with UGT1A1(*)28/(*)28 had an especially high risk of neutropenia, OR=6.87 (95% CI=1.70-27.7). Patients who had reacted with toxicity during the first two cycles were in total treated with fewer cycles (P<0.001), and less often responded to treatment (P<0.001). Genetic variation in ABCB1 was associated with both early toxicity and lower response to treatment. Carriers of the ABCB1 1236T-2677T-3435T haplotype responded to treatment less frequently (43 vs 67%, P=0.027), and survived shorter time, OR=1.56 (95% CI=1.01-2.45).
|
|
| 55. |
|
|
| 56. |
|
|
| 57. |
|
|
| 58. |
|
|
| 59. |
|
|
| 60. |
- Glimelius, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Window-of-opportunity trials to evaluate clinical activity of new molecular entities in oncology
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 22:8, s. 1717-1725
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The introduction of molecular targeted agents (e. g. monoclonal antibodies or kinase inhibitors) and cancer vaccines has raised the question whether alternate clinical trial designs, including window trials, are better suited to evaluate such new molecular entities (NMEs) and improve their approval rates. In window trials, patients receive an NME for a window of time before starting standard treatment allowing the evaluation of an NME in tumors unperturbed by previous therapies. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify window trials in adult and pediatric oncology. Results: Twenty-nine window trials were identified and reviewed, 13 in pediatric and 16 in adult oncology. Most of the trials (20/29) tested cytotoxics known to have activity in other clinical situations. In contrast to trials with pretreated patients, the window trials established the antitumor activity of melphalan, topotecan, epirubicin and etoposide in untreated patients with rhabdomyosarcoma or small-cell lung cancer. In window trials with ineffective or modestly active NMEs, we found no indication of a significant negative effect on overall survival for participating patients. Conclusions: Provided close safety monitoring and careful patient selection, window trials are a safe option to investigate potential clinical activity of NMEs.
|
|
