| 1. |
- Lundin, Evelyn, et al.
(författare)
-
Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer
- 2020
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. - : BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP. - 1048-891X .- 1525-1438. ; 30:11, s. 1719-1725
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives To compare total costs for hospital stay and post-operative recovery between robotic and abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of early-stage endometrial cancer provided in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) setting. Costs were evaluated in relation to health impact, taking a societal perspective. Methods Cost analysis was based on data from an open randomized controlled trial in an ERAS setting at a Swedish tertiary referral university hospital: 50 women with low-risk endometrial cancer scheduled for surgery between February 2012 and May 2016 were included; 25 women were allocated to robotic and 25 to abdominal hysterectomy. We compared the total time in the operating theater, procedure costs, post-operative care, length of hospital stay, readmissions, informal care, and sick leave as well as the health-related quality of life until 6 weeks after surgery. The comparison was made by using the EuroQoL group form with five dimensions and three levels (EQ-5D). The primary outcome measure was total cost; secondary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and cost per QALY. The costs were calculated in Swedish Krona (SEK). Results Age (median (IQR) 68 (63-72) vs 67 (59-75) years), duration of hospital stay (ie, time to discharge criteria were met) (median (IQR) 36 (36-36) vs 36 (36-54) hours), and sick leave (median (IQR) 25 (17-30) vs 31 (36-54) days) did not differ between the robotic and abdominal group. Time of surgery was significantly longer in the robotic group than in the abdominal group (median (IQR) 70 (60-90) vs 56 (49-84) min; p<0.05). The robotic group recovered significantly faster as measured by the EQ-5D health index and gained 0.018 QALYs until 6 weeks after surgery. Total costs were 20% higher for the robotic procedure (SEK71 634 vs SEK59 319). The total cost per QALY gained for women in the robotic group was slightly under SEK700 000. Conclusions Robotic hysterectomy used in an ERAS setting in the treatment of early endometrial cancer improved health within 6 weeks after the operation at a high cost for the health gained compared with abdominal hysterectomy. The productivity loss and informal care were lower for robotic hysterectomy, while healthcare had a higher procedure cost that could not be offset by the higher cost due to complications in the abdominal group.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lundin, Evelyn, et al.
(författare)
-
Markers of tissue damage and inflammation after robotic and abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer: a randomised controlled trial
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Scientific Reports. - : NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP. - 2045-2322. ; 10:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to analyse the dynamics of tissue damage and inflammatory response markers perioperatively and whether these differ between women operated with robotic and abdominal hysterectomy in treating early-stage endometrial cancer. At a Swedish university hospital fifty women with early-stage low-risk endometrial cancer were allocated to robotic or abdominal hysterectomy in a randomiszed controlled trial. Blood samples reflecting inflammatory responses (high sensitivity CRP, white blood cells (WBC), thrombocytes, IL-6, cortisol) and tissue damage (creatine kinase (CK), high-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1)) were collected one week preoperatively, just before surgery, postoperatively at two, 24 and 48hours, and one and six weeks postoperatively. High sensitivity CRP (p=0.03), WBC (p<0.01), IL-6 (p=0.03) and CK (p=0.03) were significantly lower in the robotic group, but fast transitory. Cortisol returned to baseline two hours after robotic hysterectomy but remained elevated in the abdominal group comparable to the preoperative high levels for both groups just before surgery (p<0.0001). Thrombocytes and HMGB1 were not affected by the mode of surgery. Postoperative inflammatory response and tissue damage were lower after robotic hysterectomy compared to abdominal hysterectomy. A significant remaining cortisol elevation two hours after surgery may reflect a higher stress response in the abdominal group.
|
|
| 3. |
- Serreyn Lundin, Evelyn, 1969-
(författare)
-
On Quality Improvement in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
- 2020
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Objectives: The overall purpose of this thesis was to find medical and surgical treatment methods of improving the perioperative care of gynaecological cancer patients. The specific objectives were to determine whether a single dose tranexamic acid given immediately before surgery for presumed advanced ovarian cancer reduces perioperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions, and to determine whether postoperative recovery, tissue damage, and inflammatory response markers differ between women operated with robotic and abdominal hysterectomy for low-risk endometrial cancer in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme, and to evaluate costs for hospital stay and postoperative recovery in relation to health impact. Material and Methods: The thesis was based on two randomised trials. The first trial was a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study conducted in four hospitals in the southeast and central of Sweden between March 2008 and May 2012. One hundred women with presumed advanced ovarian cancer who had been scheduled for radical debulking surgery were included; 50 received tranexamic acid and 50 received a placebo. The main outcomes were blood loss and red blood cell transfusions. The second trial was a randomised open single centre trial at a Swedish university hospital, which included 50 women with low-risk endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery between February 2012 and May 2016; 25 women underwent robotic hysterectomy and 25 had abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia and perioperative care followed an ERAS protocol in both groups. The EuroQol Group form EQ-5D-3L and the Short Form-36 evaluated the health-related quality of life. The Swedish Postoperative Symptoms Questionnaire assessed symptoms perioperatively until six weeks postoperatively. Venous blood samples were collected on several occasions until six weeks postoperatively and were analysed for markers reflecting inflammatory response and tissue damage. In addition, a health economic evaluation was conducted comparing total costs, qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) and cost per QALY between the surgical methods. Results: Total blood loss volume and transfusion rate following surgery in advanced ovarian cancer were significantly lower in the tranexamic group compared with the placebo group. Women with early endometrial cancer treated by robotic hysterectomy recovered significantly faster in the EQ-5D health index, and reached their preoperative level nearly two weeks earlier than the abdominal group. Differences regarding improvement in health-related quality of life (Short Form-36) comprising general health and social functioning were more favourable in the robotic hysterectomy group. Consumption of analgesics, pain intensity, postoperative symptom sum score and length of hospital stay were equal between the groups. The occurrence of complications was an independent risk factor and influenced most of the outcome measures adversely. Postoperative inflammatory response and tissue damage were lower after robotic hysterectomy compared with the abdominal approach. The robotic group gained more QALYs until six weeks after surgery than the abdominal group but the total costs were higher. The total cost per QALY gained was quite high for the robotic procedure. Conclusions: A single dose of tranexamic acid given immediately before surgery reduces blood loss and transfusion rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery. Robotic hysterectomy in an ERAS programme treating early endometrial cancer leads to a faster recovery in the health-related quality of life than abdominal hysterectomy, the latter being strongly influenced by perioperative complications. Less tissue damage and inflammation might contribute to a faster recovery in the robotic group. Robotic hysterectomy provides more QALYs until six weeks postoperatively but with a substantially higher total cost for the society.
|
|
