| 1. |
- Brownstein, Catherine A., et al.
(författare)
-
An international effort towards developing standards for best practices in analysis, interpretation and reporting of clinical genome sequencing results in the CLARITY Challenge
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Genome Biology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1465-6906 .- 1474-760X. ; 15:3, s. R53-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There is tremendous potential for genome sequencing to improve clinical diagnosis and care once it becomes routinely accessible, but this will require formalizing research methods into clinical best practices in the areas of sequence data generation, analysis, interpretation and reporting. The CLARITY Challenge was designed to spur convergence in methods for diagnosing genetic disease starting from clinical case history and genome sequencing data. DNA samples were obtained from three families with heritable genetic disorders and genomic sequence data were donated by sequencing platform vendors. The challenge was to analyze and interpret these data with the goals of identifying disease-causing variants and reporting the findings in a clinically useful format. Participating contestant groups were solicited broadly, and an independent panel of judges evaluated their performance. Results: A total of 30 international groups were engaged. The entries reveal a general convergence of practices on most elements of the analysis and interpretation process. However, even given this commonality of approach, only two groups identified the consensus candidate variants in all disease cases, demonstrating a need for consistent fine-tuning of the generally accepted methods. There was greater diversity of the final clinical report content and in the patient consenting process, demonstrating that these areas require additional exploration and standardization. Conclusions: The CLARITY Challenge provides a comprehensive assessment of current practices for using genome sequencing to diagnose and report genetic diseases. There is remarkable convergence in bioinformatic techniques, but medical interpretation and reporting are areas that require further development by many groups.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Penney, K. L., et al.
(författare)
-
mRNA expression signature of Gleason grade predicts lethal prostate cancer
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 29:17, s. 2391-2396
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Prostate-specific antigen screening has led to enormous overtreatment of prostate cancer because of the inability to distinguish potentially lethal disease at diagnosis. We reasoned that by identifying an mRNA signature of Gleason grade, the best predictor of prognosis, we could improve prediction of lethal disease among men with moderate Gleason 7 tumors, the most common grade, and the most indeterminate in terms of prognosis.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the complementary DNA-mediated annealing, selection, extension, and ligation assay, we measured the mRNA expression of 6,100 genes in prostate tumor tissue in the Swedish Watchful Waiting cohort (n = 358) and Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 109). We developed an mRNA signature of Gleason grade comparing individuals with Gleason ≤ 6 to those with Gleason ≥ 8 tumors and applied the model among patients with Gleason 7 to discriminate lethal cases.RESULTS: We built a 157-gene signature using the Swedish data that predicted Gleason with low misclassification (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91); when this signature was tested in the PHS, the discriminatory ability remained high (AUC = 0.94). In men with Gleason 7 tumors, who were excluded from the model building, the signature significantly improved the prediction of lethal disease beyond knowing whether the Gleason score was 4 + 3 or 3 + 4 (P = .006).CONCLUSION: Our expression signature and the genes identified may improve our understanding of the de-differentiation process of prostate tumors. Additionally, the signature may have clinical applications among men with Gleason 7, by further estimating their risk of lethal prostate cancer and thereby guiding therapy decisions to improve outcomes and reduce overtreatment.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Perner, Sven, et al.
(författare)
-
ERG Rearrangement Metastasis Patterns in Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0090-4295 .- 1527-9995. ; 75:4, s. 762-767
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES To interrogate multifocal prostate cancer (PCa) to determine its predilection for metastasis, using ERG rearrangement as marker of clonality. A hallmark of PCa is that distinct tumor foci may arise independently, which has important biological and clinical implications. Recent studies characterizing ERG-rearranged PCa possessing intrafocal homogeneity but interfocal heterogeneity support this hypothesis. METHODS We studied 26 patients who underwent prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy with at least 2 distinct PCa foci and 1 lymph node (LN) metastasis. Each focus was assessed for size, Gleason score, ERG rearrangement, and TMPRSS2-ERG transcript. RESULTS Fifteen of 26 cases exhibited interfocal homogeneity with regard to ERG rearrangement (ie, presence vs absence of ERG rearrangement). ERG rearrangement was present in all foci for 6 and absent in all foci for 9 cases. Two cases revealed interfocal heterogeneity with regard to rearrangement mechanism ( ie, rearrangement through insertion or deletion). Eight of 26 cases revealed interfocal heterogeneity with regard to rearrangement status. In all cases with at least 1 ERG rearranged focus, we found the corresponding LN metastasis harboring an ERG rearrangement. Interestingly, in a subset of cases the rearrangement status in the LN did not correspond to size or Gleason score. All but 2 ERG rearranged foci had detectable TMPRSS2-ERG transcript levels. CONCLUSIONS When multifocal PCa demonstrates both ERG-positive and ERG-negative foci, the positive foci have a greater predilection for metastasis. Larger studies are needed to confirm the potential additional risk an ERG rearranged focus confers on the likelihood of disease progression. UROLOGY 75: 762-767, 2010. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc.
|
|
| 10. |
- Rueenauver, K., et al.
(författare)
-
Prognostic significance of YWHAZ expression in localized prostate cancer
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 1365-7852 .- 1476-5608. ; 17:4, s. 310-314
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) patients are often over-treated because of the lack of biomarkers needed to distinguish the lethal from the indolent form of PCa. YWHAZ was recently identified as a potential therapeutic target in castration-resistant PCa (CRPC). Therefore, this study focused on determining the prognostic significance of YWHAZ in localized PCa.METHODS: YWHAZ expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 213 men who underwent radical prostatectomy. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional-hazards models were, used to assess the prognostic value of YWHAZ intensity.RESULTS: High YWHAZ expression was strongly associated with high Gleason score at the time of diagnosis (P<0.001) and PSA relapse (P=0.001). Importantly, patients with high expression of YWHAZ had a higher risk of CRPC development (P=0.002) and reduced survival time (P=0.002).CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that YWHAZ could serve as a promising prognostic biomarker in localized PCa to predict poor prognosis and to identify a subgroup of tumors, which might benefit from earlier adjuvant or YWHAZ-targeted therapy.
|
|
