| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Dutta, Ravi Kumar, 1983-
(författare)
-
Genetic and molecular alterations in aldosterone producing adenomas
- 2020
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Aldosterone producing tumors (APA, also known as Conn tumors) are adrenal tumors that overproduce aldosterone, a hormone that regulates the sodium levels in blood and contributes to blood pressure (BP) regulation. Excessive production of aldosterone causes hypertension and approximately 5-15% of hypertensive patients have hyperaldosteronism, known as primary aldosteronism (PA). Major causes of PA are bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH) or aldosterone producing adenoma (APA) and about 30% of PA patients have APAs. In most cases, the disease is unilateral, in rare case bilateral. Patients with APA are often detected when they have elevated blood pressure (BP>160/100mmHg) or when BP cannot be controlled with drugs. Surgery dramatically normalizes or lowers BP in patients with APA.In this thesis, we first explored the mutation frequency in susceptibility genes in sporadic APAs. About 60% of APAs displayed complementary mutations in the KCNJ5, ATP1A1, ATP2B3, CTNNB1, CACNAID and CLCN2 genes (Paper I, II & III). Copy number variation analysis of 35 APAs identified amplification of chromosome 10q24.31 in two tumors, where CALHM1-3- genes encoding for potential calcium ion channels are located. Only CALHM2 is expressed in adrenals and sequencing of CALHM2 revealed three different heterozygous sequence variants; c.341_42delCT (CALHM2P114Rfs*12), c.286G>A (CALHM2A96T) and c.580G>A (CALHM2V194M) in 5 APAs. CALHM2 is expressed in the mitochondrial membranes and Ca2+ imaging revealed that CALHM2 has selection of another ion rather than Ca2+. The genetic variant CALHM2V194M converts CALHM2 into a non-selective channel and results in higher Ca2+ conductance in mitochondria. We further found that loss of CALHM2 function upregulates REELIN/LRP8 signaling activating β-catenin dependent transcription of target genes (Paper II). In Paper IV, we investigated Scandinavian APA cases (n=35) and Swedish controls (n=60) for GWAS and discovered a susceptibility locus on chromosome Xq13.3 in a 4 Mb region to be significantly associated with APAs. Significance level was still same after genotyping the sentinel SNP rs2224095 in a replication cohort of APAs (n=52) and controls (n=740). Sequencing of an adjacent gene of the sentinel SNP, MAGEE1, identified a rare variant in one APA, which is complementary to other mutations in our primary cohort. In Summary, our studies have increased the knowledge of molecular genetic events in APAs. The results may contribute to find future non-surgical treatments for APAs.
|
|
| 3. |
- Malmström, Annika, 1957-, et al.
(författare)
-
Do we really know who has an MGMT methylated glioma? : results of an international survey regarding use of MGMT analyses for glioma
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Neuro-Oncology Practice. - Oxford : Oxford University Press. - 2054-2577 .- 2054-2585. ; 7:1, s. 68-76
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Glioma O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status informs clinical decision making. Worldwide different methods and cutoff levels are used, which can lead to discordant methylation results.Methods: We conducted an international survey to clarify which methods are regularly used and why. We also explored opinions regarding international consensus on methods and cutoff.Results: The survey had 152 respondents from 25 countries. MGMT methylation status is determined for all glioblastomas in 37% of laboratories. The most common methods are methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (msPCR) (37%) and pyrosequencing (34%). A method is selected for simplicity (56%), cost-effectiveness (50%), and reproducibility of results (52%). For sequencing, the number of CpG sites analyzed varies from 1–3 up to more than 16. For 50% of laboratories, the company producing the kit determines which CpG sites are examined, whereas 33% select the sites themselves. Selection of cutoff is equally distributed among a cutoff defined in the literature, by the local laboratory, or by the outside laboratory performing the analysis. This cutoff varies, reported from 1% to 30%, and in 1 laboratory tumor is determined as methylated in case of 1 methylated CpG site of 17 analyzed. Some report tumors as unmethylated or weakly vs highly methylated. An international consensus on MGMT methylation method and cutoff is warranted by 66% and 76% of respondents, respectively. The method preferred would be msPCR (45%) or pyrosequencing (42%), whereas 18% suggest next-generation sequencing.Conclusion: Although analysis of MGMT methylation status is routine, there is controversy regarding laboratory methods and cutoff level. Most respondents favor development of international consensus guidelines.
|
|
