| 1. |
- Cederblad, Maria, 1968-, et al.
(författare)
-
Infrequent enuresis, the uninvestigated majority : comparisons between children with enuresis of varying severity.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Pediatric Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1477-5131 .- 1873-4898. ; 11:1, s. 24.e1-24.e6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to compare children with frequent enuresis (FE) and children with infrequent enuresis (IE) using anamnestic data and variables related to bladder and kidney function. A secondary aim was to look at the group of children who wet their beds every single night, a phenomenon we chose to call constant enuresis (CE).SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The parents recorded the number of wet and dry nights for a period of 14 days, and measured the voided volumes as well as nocturnal urine production for 48 h. History data relevant to bladder and bowel function was also recorded.RESULTS: The children could be grouped as follows: IE, n = 14; FE, n = 18; and CE, n = 22. The children with IE were slightly older than the other groups, IE mean 7.57; FE mean 6.22; CE, mean 6.56 (p = 0.004). When comparing the groups in terms of the measured parameters, only one significant difference was found: the FE group had larger average daytime voided volumes, but only when the first morning void was included. The only significantly differing anamnestic variable was previous daytime incontinence, which was more common among the children in the IE group.CONCLUSIONS: When comparing children with varying enuresis severity, no major differences regarding bladder function and urine production were found. Furthermore, children with infrequent enuresis tend to be slightly older when they seek medical help.
|
|
| 2. |
- Cederblad, Maria, 1968-, et al.
(författare)
-
No effect of basic bladder advice in enuresis : a randomised controlled trial
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Journal of Pediatric Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1477-5131 .- 1873-4898. ; 11:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundThere are two firstline, evidence-based treatments available for nocturnal enuresis: desmopressin and the enuresis alarm. Prior to use of these therapies, international experts usually recommend that the children also be given basic bladder training during the daytime. The rationale behind this recommendation is that daytime bladder training or urotherapy, is a mainstay in the treatment of daytime incontinence caused by detrusor overactivity. Still, there is, as yet, no firm evidence that daytime bladder training is useful against nocturnal enuresis.AimTo explore whether basic bladder advice has any effect against nocturnal enuresis.Study designThe study was prospective, randomized, and controlled. The evaluated intervention was bladder advice, given in accordance with ICCS guidelines and focused on regular voiding, sound voiding posture, and sufficient fluid intake. Forty children aged 6 years or more with previously untreated enuresis, but no daytime incontinence, were randomized (20 in each group) to receive either first basic bladder advice for 1 month and then alarm therapy (group A) or just the alarm therapy (group B). Based on power calculations, the minimum number of children required in each treatment arm was 15.ResultsThe basic bladder advice did not reduce the enuresis frequency in group A (p = 0.089) and the end result after alarm therapy did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.74) (see Table). Only four children in group A had a partial or full response to bladder training, and two of these children relapsed immediately during alarm therapy.DiscussionThis was the first study to evaluate, in a prospective, randomized manner, the value of daytime basic bladder training as a treatment of enuresis. It was found that the treatment neither resulted in a significant reduction in the number of wet nights, nor did it improve the success of subsequent alarm therapy.ConclusionsThe recommendation that all children with enuresis be given bladder training as a firstline therapy can no longer be supported. Instead, we recommend that treatment of these children start with the enuresis alarm or desmopressin without delay.
|
|
| 3. |
- Nayeb, Laleh, et al.
(författare)
-
Child healthcare nurses believe that bilingual children show slower language development, simplify screening procedures and delay referrals
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Acta Pædiatrica. - : Wiley. - 1651-2227 .- 0803-5253. ; 104:2, s. 198-205
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AimA significant number of children living in Sweden are bilingual, but how language screening is performed in this group is unknown. We investigated child healthcare nurses' perceptions of the language screening of bilingual children aged 30-36months, together with their clinical practices. MethodsAn online questionnaire was completed by 863 nurses who performed language screening of bilingual children in Sweden at least once a month, corresponding to 89% of the target population. Cox regression identified predictors of the nurses' tendency to simplify the screening of bilingual children. ResultsThe nurses reported a greater lack of confidence and more difficulties in interpreting screening outcomes for bilingual than monolingual children (p<0.001). Half of the nurses simplified the screening processes for bilingual children and 74% postponed referrals to speech and language services, basing these adaptations on their perceptions of the children's Swedish language skills (p<0.001). Most nurses (82%) believed that language development was slower in bilingual children, and this was the strongest predictor of simplified screening practices (RR=2.00, 95% CI 1.44-2.77). ConclusionChild healthcare nurses need easily accessible information and clear guidelines on the language development of bilingual children to ensure that bilingual and monolingual children receive equitable language screening services.
|
|
| 4. |
- Sarkadi, Anna, 1974-
(författare)
-
Use it or lose it : Barns hjärnor som samhällsinvestering
- 2015
-
Ingår i: <em>Kungliga Vetenskapssamhället i Uppsalas Årsbok 40/2013-2014</em>. - Uppsala : Kungliga Vetenskapssamhället i Uppsala. - 9789185832255 ; , s. 159-172
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
