| 1. |
- Lindahl, Britt, et al.
(författare)
-
Socio-scientific Issues : A Way to Improve Students’ Interest and Learning?
- 2011
-
Ingår i: US-China Education Review B. - New York : David Publishing Company. - 2161-6248 .- 1548-6613 .- 1930-1529. ; 8:9, s. 342-347
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- According to many documents, there is a strong need to renew science education. One way could be to work with SSI (socio-scientific issues). This paper reports on both students' and teachers' experiences and learning when working with socio-scientific issues in science education in secondary school (aged from 13 to 16). The approach is multidimensional, as factors that influence cognition as well as motivation and the forming of attitudes are complex. Results suggest that SSI work forms are more important than personal factors for explaining outcomes. Relevant issues, autonomy and functioning group work seem to be important aspects of successful SSI work together with structure provided by the teacher, and information that challenges previous knowledge. In general, SSI seems to be most efficient for students, who believe that they learn from presenting and discussing their knowledge, focus on "the large picture", acknowledge own responsibility for learning, find school science personally relevant and are self-efficacious. It seems that the outcomes from SSI work are much in the hands of the teacher. This paper is a short summary of the first year and quantitative part of the project. Further results from the project will later be found in our homepage (http://www.sisc.se).
|
|
| 2. |
- Adolfsson, Lena, 1955-
(författare)
-
Attityder till naturvetenskap : Förändringar av flickors och pojkars attityder till biologi, fysik och kemi 1995 till 2007
- 2011
-
Licentiatavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- I den här avhandlingen beskrivs hur hög- och lågpresterande flickors och pojkars attityder till biologi, fysik och kemi har förändrats från 1995 till 2007. Data från den svenska delen av TIMSS-studierna för årskurs 8 i Sverige används. För att definiera hög- och lågpresterande används resultatet på matematikprovet från TIMSS och attityderna undersöks med hjälp av fyra frågor från elevenkäterna. Resultatet diskuteras utifrån olika perspektiv som kan bidra till förståelsen av den komplexa bilden av olika faktorers betydelse för elevers attityder till naturvetenskap. Det första resultatet, pojkar är mer positiva till fysik och kemi och flickor till biologi, diskuteras utifrån ämnenas genuskodning. På ett symboliskt plan är fysik och kemi mer förknippade med maskulinitet än biologi. Det andra resultatet, högpresterande elever och särskilt pojkar, är mindre positiva till de tre ämnena 2007 än 1995. Det resultatet diskuteras mot bakgrund av ungdomars identitet och identitetskonstruktion. Det verkar som om unga människor i dag inte tycker att utbildningar och arbeten inom det naturvetenskapliga och tekniska området ger dem möjligheter att använda sina talanger, kreativitet och självförverkligande. Resultatet diskuteras också utifrån de förändringar av arbetsmetoder som har skett i svensk skola där det individuella arbetet har ökat och lärarledda genomgångar har minskat. Kan det ha påverkat de högpresterande eleverna så att de har blivit mindre stimulerade och fått färre utmaningar och på så sätt blivit mindre positiva till de naturvetenskapliga ämnena? Det tredje resultatet, en större andel hög- och lågpresterande pojkar tycker att de tre ämnena är tråkiga 2007 jämfört med 1995, diskuteras utifrån begreppen "antipluggkultur" och att vara "cool". Kan resultatet från denna studie indikera att det är viktigare för pojkar 2007 att ha en attityd att visa sig ”cool” och att inte plugga. Kan detta ha påverkat attityderna till de naturvetenskapliga ämnena negativt? Slutligen visar resultaten att lågpresterande flickor och pojkar tycker att de presterar bättre 2007 än 1995 och det diskuteras mot bakgrund av förändringarna av arbetsmetoder i den svenska skolan. Mer tid ägnas åt individuellt arbete vilket kan innebära att de lågpresterande eleverna väljer att inte arbeta med svårare uppgifter och att de därför upplever att de presterar bättre. Avhandlingen avslutas med mina egna reflektioner kring undervisningen i de naturvetenskapliga ämnena i grundskolan, kring förändringarna av flickors och pojkars attityder till naturvetenskap utifrån resultaten från denna studie och kring mina erfarenheter som lärare i dessa ämnen.
|
|
| 3. |
- Angervall, Petra, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Akademisk karriär i sociala nätverk
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Kön och karriär i akademin. En studie inom det utbildningsvetenskapliga fältet.. - Göteborg : University of Gothenburg. - 9781608057276 ; , s. 124-142
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Angervall, Petra, et al.
(författare)
-
Gendered networks in academia
- 2011
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper takes as a starting point the complexities and proposed changes of contemporary power relations within academia recognised throughout the Western world. For example, it is said that ‘traditional’ gender relations are losing ground as growing numbers of women position themselves in e.g. educational research (Murray & Maguire, 2007; Arnesen et al., 2008; HSV, 2008). However, the pattern is still that men occupy more senior positions (Ducklin & Ozga, 200; Kurtz-Costes et al., 2006; Silander, 2010). Notwithstanding, institutions are influenced by a growing performative discourse, which might affect the dominating power and gender relations in research work (Acker, 2008). Our paper presents preliminary findings from a Swedish research project, Gender and career in academia, the main aim of which is to develop knowledge about gender and other power relations within universities. Six academic institutions were selected to present a variety of departments of education/educational sciences according to location, size, major orientation, traditions, and externally funded research. We also interviewed approximately 120 doctoral students and junior researches, in order to map structures, positions and relations within research groups, and in doctoral programmes (Smith, 2005). Theoretically, we draw on Ball’s (2008, 2009), Rhodes’ (1997) and Newman’s (2001) ideas of governance and networks in institutional contexts. It is argued that academic institutions, departments and milieus vary with regard to social and economic capital (Bourdieu, 1986; Field, 2009; Lin, 2002), used as resources for power. These resources promote certain networks and groups before others, they condition scientific interests, and how positions are given and ordered, i.e. they enable different careers. We further agree with Connell (1996, 2002) and others who underline that gender can be performed differently depending on contexts, i.e. the power and gender regimes do not automatically follow the prevalent gender order. In this paper we focus on one of the six selected academic institutions. The aim is to show how individual and collective resources are provided and used from a power and gender perspective. A preliminary analysis shows that subject discipline, research traditions and external funding influence junior researchers’ possibilities to access horizontal and vertical networks and other career productive resources. Also, former supervisors are found to act as gatekeepers to networks and capital which condition career paths. Notions of gender and other social categories impact on junior researchers’ possibilities to be seen as ‘promising’ researchers with potentials to make a successful career. The analysis also illustrates how positions in the horizontal institutional network tend to affect positions provided by the vertical network. Resources (social, economic) used and provided in the horizontal network are often needed in order for the researcher to be admitted into the vertical network. Further, aspects of trust play an important role in the process, where institutional networks and different positions are established. We also argue that many vertical networks promote performativity and thereby exclude those (often women) lacking legitimacy and certain resources for power.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Angervall, Petra, 1970, et al.
(författare)
-
Studiens kontext, begreppsram och empiri
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Kön och karriär i akademin. - Göteborg : Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis. - 0436-1121. - 9789173467612 - 9789173467629 ; , s. 19-37
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Ekborg, Margareta, et al.
(författare)
-
Teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues : a large scale and in depth study
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Research in science education. - : Springer Netherlands. - 0157-244X .- 1573-1898. ; 43:2, s. 599-617
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The research is an investigation of teachers’ experience of working with socio-scientific issues (SSI). A large group of teachers (55) chose one of six cases with the characteristics of SSI and were free to organize the work as they found appropriate. The research focuses on how teachers chose content, organized their work and experienced the students’ interest and learning. The teachers answered a questionnaire after working with the cases and seven of them were interviewed to provide in-depth understanding of issues raised in the questionnaire. The teachers found the SSI to be current topics with interesting content and relevant tasks and they felt confident about the work. They were quite content with the students’ learning of scientific facts, how to apply scientific knowledge and to search for information. However, they found that the students did not easily formulate questions, critically examine arguments or use media to obtain information about the task. The interviewed teachers did not find this work new, but they organized it as ‘a special event’. They understood SSI work as ‘free’ work and group work was frequent, but only a few of the teachers developed explicit strategies for teaching SSI. They had different ideas about learning but they all talked about knowledge as a set of facts to be taken in by the students. They all included elements of SSI but mostly to introduce the regular science content. However the teachers started to reflect upon the potential of using SSI to cover more goals in the curriculum.
|
|
| 9. |
- Gustafsson, Jan, 1960, et al.
(författare)
-
Gendered Networks: On power and gender in Acade
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Gender and education, konferensbidrag. 27-29/4. Exeter, Storbritannien.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper takes as a starting point the complexities and proposed changes of contemporary power relations within academia recognised throughout the Western world. For example, it is said that ‘traditional’ gender relations are losing ground as growing numbers of women position themselves in e.g. educational research (Murray & Maguire, 2007; Arnesen et al., 2008; HSV, 2008). However, the pattern is still that men occupy more senior positions (Ducklin & Ozga, 200; Kurtz-Costes et al., 2006; Silander, 2010). Notwithstanding, institutions are influenced by a growing performative discourse, which might affect the dominating power and gender relations in research work (Acker, 2008). Our paper presents preliminary findings from a Swedish research project, Gender and career in academia, the main aim of which is to develop knowledge about gender and other power relations within universities. Six academic institutions were selected to present a variety of departments of education/educational sciences according to location, size, major orientation, traditions, and externally funded research. We also interviewed approximately 120 doctoral students and junior researches, in order to map structures, positions and relations within research groups, and in doctoral programmes (Smith, 2005). Theoretically, we draw on Ball’s (2008, 2009), Rhodes’ (1997) and Newman’s (2001) ideas of governance and networks in institutional contexts. It is argued that academic institutions, departments and milieus vary with regard to social and economic capital (Bourdieu, 1986; Field, 2009; Lin, 2002), used as resources for power. These resources promote certain networks and groups before others, they condition scientific interests, and how positions are given and ordered, i.e. they enable different careers. We further agree with Connell (1996, 2002) and others who underline that gender can be performed differently depending on contexts, i.e. the power and gender regimes do not automatically follow the prevalent gender order. In this paper we focus on one of the six selected academic institutions. The aim is to show how individual and collective resources are provided and used from a power and gender perspective. A preliminary analysis shows that subject discipline, research traditions and external funding influence junior researchers’ possibilities to access networks and other career productive resources. Also, former supervisors are found to act as gatekeepers to networks and capital which condition career paths. Notions of gender and other social categories impact on junior researchers’ possibilities to be seen as ‘promising’ researchers with potentials to make a successful career.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
