SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Sox Carol)
 

Search: WFRF:(Sox Carol) > (2017) > Pooled individual p...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Pooled individual patient data from five countries were used to derive a clinical prediction rule for coronary artery disease in primary care.

Aerts, Marc (author)
Minalu, Girma (author)
Bösner, Stefan (author)
show more...
Buntinx, Frank (author)
Burnand, Bernard (author)
Haasenritter, Jörg (author)
Herzig, Lilli (author)
Knottnerus, J André (author)
Nilsson, Staffan (author)
Renier, Walter (author)
Sox, Carol (author)
Sox, Harold (author)
Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert (author)
show less...
 (publisher)
 (publisher)
show more...
 (publisher)
show less...
Elsevier 2017
2017
English.
In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. - 0895-4356. ; 81, 120-128
  • swepub:Mat__t
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • OBJECTIVE: To construct a clinical prediction rule for coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting with chest pain in primary care. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Meta-Analysis using 3,099 patients from five studies. To identify candidate predictors, we used random forest trees, multiple imputation of missing values, and logistic regression within individual studies. To generate a prediction rule on the pooled data, we applied a regression model that took account of the differing standard data sets collected by the five studies. RESULTS: The most parsimonious rule included six equally weighted predictors: age ≥55 (males) or ≥65 (females) (+1); attending physician suspected a serious diagnosis (+1); history of CAD (+1); pain brought on by exertion (+1); pain feels like "pressure" (+1); pain reproducible by palpation (-1). CAD was considered absent if the prediction score is <2. The area under the ROC curve was 0.84. We applied this rule to a study setting with a CAD prevalence of 13.2% using a prediction score cutoff of <2 (i.e., -1, 0, or +1). When the score was <2, the probability of CAD was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.1-3.9%); when the score was ≥ 2, it was 43.0% (95% CI: 35.8-50.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical prediction rules are a key strategy for individualizing care. Large data sets based on electronic health records from diverse sites create opportunities for improving their internal and external validity. Our patient-level meta-analysis from five primary care sites should improve external validity. Our strategy for addressing site-to-site systematic variation in missing data should improve internal validity. Using principles derived from decision theory, we also discuss the problem of setting the cutoff prediction score for taking action.

Subject headings

Medical and Health Sciences  (hsv)
Health Sciences  (hsv)
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology  (hsv)
Medicin och hälsovetenskap  (hsv)
Hälsovetenskaper  (hsv)
Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi  (hsv)
Clinical Medicine  (hsv)
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems  (hsv)
Klinisk medicin  (hsv)
Kardiologi  (hsv)

Keyword

Chest pain
Individual patient data meta-analysis
Medical history taking
Myocardial ischemia
Primary health care
Sensitivity and specificity
Symptom assessment

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view