| 1. |
- ALCOCK, SJ, et al.
(författare)
-
THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW CHEMICAL SENSORS FOR INVIVO MONITORING
- 1991
-
Ingår i: Biosensors & bioelectronics. - : Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.. - 0956-5663 .- 1873-4235. ; 6:8, s. 647-652
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The latest workshop of the European Community (EC) Concerted Action on Chemical sensors for in vivo monitoring was held in Nauplion, Greece, in April this year. This fifth workshop focused on The design and development of new sensors for in vivo monitoring, and was organized into five sessions: design and development of new sensors; operational considerations; performance of analytical systems; novel sensors/tissue heterogeneity; and infra-red spectroscopy.
|
|
| 2. |
- Levine, M S, et al.
(författare)
-
Duodenitis: a reliable radiologic diagnosis?
- 1991
-
Ingår i: Gastrointestinal Radiology. - 0364-2356. ; 16:2, s. 99-103
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The authors performed a retrospective study of 50 patients with endoscopically diagnosed duodenitis who had undergone double-contrast upper gastrointestinal (GI) examinations. Duodenitis was diagnosed on the original radiographic reports in six of 37 patients (16%) with mild-to-moderate duodenitis, five of 13 patients (38%) with severe duodenitis, and 11 of 50 patients (22%) with all grades of duodenitis on endoscopy. Subsequent analysis of the films revealed one or more radiologic signs of duodenitis (including folds more than 4 mm in thickness, mucosal nodularity, bulbar deformity, and erosions) in 18 of 37 patients (49%) with mild-to-moderate duodenitis, eight of 13 patients (62%) with severe duodenitis, and 26 of 50 patients (52%) with all grades of duodenitis on endoscopy. In a separate part of the study, the authors identified another 20 patients with radiographically diagnosed duodenitis who had undergone endoscopic examinations. Nine of those 20 patients (45%) had duodenitis on endoscopy. Subsequent analysis of the films revealed one or more signs of duodenitis in 17 patients from this group. Nine of the latter patients (53%) had duodenitis on endoscopy. Using established radiologic criteria for duodenitis, our rate of false-positive and false-negative radiologic diagnoses still was about 50%. Thus, the double-contrast upper GI examination is a relatively unreliable technique for diagnosing duodenitis.
|
|
