SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "hsv:(HUMANIORA) hsv:(Annan humaniora) hsv:(Övrig annan humaniora) ;pers:(Vigsö Orla)"

Sökning: hsv:(HUMANIORA) hsv:(Annan humaniora) hsv:(Övrig annan humaniora) > Vigsö Orla

  • Resultat 1-10 av 22
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Brügger, Niels, et al. (författare)
  • Strukturalisme
  • 2002
  • Bok (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
3.
  • Hansson-Nylund, Helena, 1978- (författare)
  • Hållbar dialog? : Retorik i möten om svensk kärnavfallshantering
  • 2016
  • Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • Rhetorical choices and strategies are central to democratic decision-making, especially regarding decisions on matters that are open for argumentation depending on perspective. The thesis considers public meetings on Swedish nuclear waste management as an example of rhetorical argumentation, specifically in relation to the project of finding a place for final deposition of the high-level spent nuclear fuel – with local geological investigation as a critical part of that project. Project managers have met with other organizations such as protest groups, associations of experts and authorities on several occasions, mainly through local and national hearings. The thesis is guided by a research question regarding the most salient challenges to a resilient rhetorical dialogue for nuclear waste management. The concept of rhetorical dialogue is applied in two ways. Firstly to explain the lack of dialogue that is experienced by participants despite arrangements to reach consensus-oriented dialogue in the Habermasian sense. Secondly in a discussion of rhetorical relations that might explain ambiguity in participants’ interpretations of each other. Three meetings are compared: two local meetings at sites of geological investigation (Kynnefjäll 1979 and Kolsjön 1985) and one national meeting held in Stockholm in 2008. Research materials have been collected from the archives of participating organizations and from interviews with participants. Analyses of these materials are combined with a rhetorical analysis of meeting recordings, with a specific focus on question-reply argumentation. One main conclusion is that the principal rhetorical challenges concern the roles of participants in relation to the rhetorical situation, the establishment of rhetorical genre in the format of hearings, and inclusion of relevant perspectives in the early project phase.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  • Mral, Brigitte, et al. (författare)
  • Risk communication from a rhetorical perspective
  • 2010
  • Ingår i: Communicating risks. - Göteborg : Nordicom. - 9789186523138 ; , s. 53-71
  • Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Risk and crisis scenarios always create different kinds of rhetorical situations, i.e. situations that call for discursive action. The aim of this chapter is to discuss how classical and modern rhetorical theories and methods can contribute to research on threat images and risk- and crisis communication. Rhetoric research focuses on the persuasive elements in discourses and sees “rhetoricity” as integrated in all kinds of communication. Rhetoric offers well structured methods for analyzing content, style, form and argumentation in communication, weather it is a question of text, picture, mediated communication or dialogue and conversation. In this chapter we exemplify the rhetorical approach by analyzing public hearings, concerning the question of nuclear waste management in Sweden. The hearings, conducted by the nuclear waste council, are studied with regard both to argumentation and attitudes. The analysis reveals a considerable gap between “technosphere” and “demosphere”, i.e. expert discourse and civic discourse, far from an open dialogue on this complex and crucial issue.
  •  
6.
  • Vigsø, Orla, 1962, et al. (författare)
  • Argumentum ad solidaritatem: Rhetorical Leadership Strategies in Scandinavia During COVID-19.
  • 2021
  • Ingår i: Communicating COVID-19. Interdisciplinary Perspectives.. - Cham : Palgrave Macmillan. - 9783030797348 ; , s. 163-184
  • Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In this chapter, we examine how Scandinavian leaders motivated and justified the measures enacted in the first phase of COVID-19. We find that leaders in all three countries couched their argumentation in appeals to solidarity, a form of argument so distinct that we dub it the argumentum ad solidaritatem. This appeal varied somewhat, however, between the otherwise similar Scandinavian countries. Specifically, Sweden stood out from the other two in leaving most of the communication to its Public Health Agency rather than to its political leaders, the result being a more technical (i.e. expert medical) form of rhetoric. We argue that this reflects a tradition in Sweden for a social division of administrative labour which is distinct from that in Denmark and Norway. To the extent this tradition is part of Sweden’s political culture, Sweden’s leadership displayed exactly the same rhetorical skills as did their Scandinavian neighbours: They attuned successfully to the rhetorical ‘constraints’ of the situation within their country, and largely retained the trust and confidence of their population. But because the outcomes have differed so strongly between these countries, the Scandinavian case forces us to recognize the difference between rhetorical success and general success in responding to a pandemic.
  •  
7.
  • Vigsö, Orla, 1962- (författare)
  • Att argumentera i besvärliga situationer
  • 2008
  • Ingår i: Retorikmagasinet. - Åstorp : Retorikförlaget. - 1403-9052. ; :37, s. 29-30
  • Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Vigsö, Orla, 1962- (författare)
  • För de redan frälsta
  • 2007
  • Ingår i: Retorikmagasinet. - Åstorp : Retorikförlaget. ; :35/36, s. 20-25
  • Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 22

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy