| 1. |
- Mjør, Kåre Johan, 1973-
(författare)
-
A Past of One's Own : The Post-Soviet Historiography of Russian Philosophy
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Ab Imperio. - Kazan : Redaktsiya Zhurnala Ab Imperio. - 2166-4072 .- 2164-9731. ; 3, s. 315-350
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article analyzes the historiography of Russian philosophy as it appears in post-Soviet Russian university textbooks. How is a national tradition in philosophy – a discipline that otherwise operates with a universal truth-claim not bound by its cultural settings – created and defended in these texts? Particular emphasis is placed on their rejection of the alleged Eurocentrism of Western historiography, their dependence (nevertheless) on Western notions of philosophy, and their idea of Russian philosophy as "native philosophy" (otechestvennaia filosofiia) with an independent "integral history." The article concludes that this material presents us with an example of cultural nationalism in academic writing.
|
|
| 2. |
- Mjør, Kåre Johan, 1973-
(författare)
-
Det slavofile russlandsbildet
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Kirke og kultur. - Universitetsforlaget. - 0023-186X .- 1504-3002. ; :2, s. 169-185
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Mjør, Kåre Johan, 1973-
(författare)
-
Ein unik sivilisasjon : Russlandsførestellingar før og no
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift. - Oslo : Universitetsforlaget. - 0800-336X .- 1504-3053. ; :3, s. 237-247
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The article explores the so-called “civilizational nationalism” that is becoming increasingly popular in post-Soviet Russia, as seen most recently in an article Vladimir Putin published in January 2012. Here he adopts the rhetoric of “Russia as a unique civilization” that had previously been developed by Russian public intellectuals and academics. Having outlined the general features of this ideology, the article provides a more detailed discussion of one of the most significant theoreticians of this nationalism, Aleksandr Panarin. His views are compared, in turn, with those of Nikolai Danilevskii, the nineteenth-century writer who introduced “civilization” into Russian public discourse. Despite the many similarities, for instance a shared critique of Eurocentrism, it is demonstrated that nineteenth-century ideas of a Russian civilization differ significantly from the post-Soviet ones, above all in the former’s temporal orientation towards the future. Post-Soviet civilizational nationalism, in contrast, locates Russian civilization first and foremost in the past.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
