| 1. |
- Kelhoffer, James Anthony, 1970-
(author)
-
Art : Late Antiquity
- 2000
-
In: <em>Reader’s Guide to Judaism</em>. - Chicago and London : Fitzroy Dearborn. - 9781579581398 ; , s. 43-44
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)
|
|
| 2. |
- Berglund, Carl Johan, 1973-
(author)
-
Origen’s References to Heracleon : A Quotation-Analytical Study of the Earliest Known Commentary on the Gospel of John
- 2019
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This study of Origen’s references to the second-century author Heracleon addresses two problems in previous research: Scholars have regularly presumed that every statement Origen attributes to Heracleon is equivalent to a verbatim quotation, and that Heracleon’s beliefs conform to those described in heresiological sources. The study develops a method of quotation analysis that uses variations in Origen’s attribution formulas to categorize the almost two hundred references as “verbatim quotations,” “summaries,” “explanatory paraphrases,” or “mere assertions.” The more trustworthy references are used to reconstruct Heracleon’s interpretations within a context given by the literature to which he refers himself, including the Gospel of John, a Synoptic gospel tradition similar to the Gospel of Matthew, a collection of Pauline epistles, and the Preaching of Peter. The views exhibited in Heracleon’s comments are compared to those used by Origen to categorize his exegetical opponents. The study identifies over fifty quotations from Heracleon and seventy summaries of his interpretations, and concludes that the views of the heterodox and “those who bring in the natures” are more likely to be inferred by Origen than expressed by Heracleon.
|
|
| 3. |
-
Die Johannesapokalypse : Kontexte – Konzepte – Rezeption
- 2012. - 1st
-
Editorial collection (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The Revelation of John receives much attention in New Testament scholarship. This volume offers an extensive discussion of Revelation's historical location and date, its history-of-religions background and reception of early Christian tradition, as well as its rhetoric and theological aims and concepts. The volume contains papers from a Symposium held in Munich and additional invited contributions, which survey some of the most important current debates. The first part -"contexts"- contains essays on the text and the traditions adopted, the historical context and date of Revelation. The second part -"concepts"- focuses on theological themes, from Christology to eschatology and martyrdom. A third part on -"effects"- contains essays on several important forms of the reception of Revelation, from Montanism and Lactantius down to Orthodox liturgy and the art of William Blake. Survey of contents:Franz Tóth: Erträge und Tendenzen der gegenwärtigen Forschung zur JohannesapokalypseI. Kontexte Martin Karrer: Der Text der Johannesapokalypse - Thomas Witulski: Der römische Kaiser Hadrian und die neutestamentliche Johannesapokalypse - Stefan Witetschek: Ein weit geöffnetes Zeitfenster? Überlegungen zur Datierung der Johannesapokalypse – Michael Labahn: Die Septuaginta und die Johannesapokalypse: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen einer Verhältnisbestimmung im Spiegel von kreativer Intertextualität und Textentwicklungen - Loren T. Stuckenbruck / Mark D. Mathews: The Apocalypse of John, 1 Enoch, and the Question of Influence – Enno Edzard Popkes: Vollendete Gottesgegenwart: Anmerkungen zu den traditionsgeschichtlichen Bezugsgrößen von Apk 21,1-5 - Clare K. Rothschild: Principle, Power, and Purgation in the Letter to the Church in Laodicea (Rev 3:14-22) - Jan Dochhorn: Beliar als Endtyrann in der Ascensio Isaiae. Ein Beitrag zur Eschatologie und Satanologie des frühen Christentums sowie zur Erforschung der Apokalypse des Johannes II. Konzepte Franz Tóth: Von der Vision zur Redaktion. Untersuchungen zur Komposition, Redaktion und Intention der Johannesapokalypse - Hans-Georg Gradl: Buch und Brief. Zur motivischen, literarischen und kommunikativen Interdependenz zweier medialer Typen in der Johannes-Offenbarung - Konrad Huber: Jesus Christus - der Erste und der Letzte. Zur Christologie der Johannesapokalypse - Jörg Frey: Was erwartet die Johannesapokalypse? Zur Eschatologie des letzten Buchs der Bibel - James A. Kelhoffer: The Relevance of Revelation's Date and the Imperial Cult for John's Appraisal of the Value of Christians' Suffering in Revelation 1-3 - Jan Willem van Henten: The Concept of Martyrdom in Revelation - Roland Bergmeier: Zeugnis und MartyriumIII. Rezeption William Tabbernee: The Appearance of the New Jerusalem in Montanist Interpretation and the Revelation of John - Tobias Nicklas: Die apokryphe Thomasapokalypse und ihre Rezeption der Offenbarung desJohannes - Valentin Fàbrega: Laktanz und die Apokalypse - Juan Hernández, Jr.: Andrew of Caesarea and His Reading of Revelation. Catechesis and Paranesis -Konstantin Nikolakopoulos: Die Apokalypse des Johannes und die orthodoxe Liturgie. Anknüpfungspunkte zwischen Apokalypse und orthodoxem Kultus - Christopher Rowland: ‘Mr. Blake: apo- or rather ana-calyptic Poet and Painter’: Apocalyptic Hermeneutics in Action
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Kelhoffer, James Anthony, 1970-
(author)
-
A Tale of Two Markan Characterizations : The Exemplary Woman Who Anointed Jesus’ Body for Burial (14:3–9) and the Silent Trio Who Fled the Empty Tomb (16:1–8)
- 2010. - 1st
-
In: Women and Gender in Ancient Religions. - Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck. - 9783161505799 ; , s. 85-98
-
Book chapter (other academic/artistic)abstract
- This essay develops two theses. First, Mark offers the anonymous woman who anointed Jesus’ body for burial (14:3–9) as a laudatory example of discipleship in contrast to the twelve apostles and in particular to Judas Iscariot. Second, with the women who discover the empty tomb at the end of this Gospel (16:1–8) Mark offers a negative, rather than a positive, example of discipleship. In the latter passage the women’s failure to report the message of the resurrection offers a narrative continuation of the Twelve’s many failures earlier in Mark. Therefore, attempts by some scholars to construe the women at the end of Mark as a positive example of discipleship are mistaken.
|
|
| 7. |
- Kelhoffer, James Anthony, 1970-
(author)
-
Apocalyptic Eschatology in the Gospel of Matthew
- 1998
-
In: Currents in Theology and Mission. - 0098-2113. ; 25, s. 524-524
-
Review (pop. science, debate, etc.)abstract
- Review of Apocalyptic Eschatology in the Gospel of Matthew. By David C. Sim. (SNTS MS 88; Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1996). In Currents in Theology and Mission 25 (December, 1998): 524.
|
|
| 8. |
- Kelhoffer, James Anthony, 1970-
(author)
-
Aspects of Religious Contact and Conflict in the Ancient World
- 1997
-
In: Journal of early Christian studies (Print). - 1067-6341 .- 1086-3184. ; 5:2, s. 297-298
-
Review (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Review of Aspects of Religious Contact and Conflict in the Ancient World. Edited by Pieter W. van der Horst (Utrechtse Theologische Reeks 31; Utrecht: Faculteit der Godgeleerdheid, Universiteit Utrecht, 1995). In the Journal of Early Christian Studies 5/2 (1997): 297–298.
|
|
| 9. |
- Kelhoffer, James Anthony, 1970-
(author)
-
Basilides’s Gospel and Exegetica (Treatises)
- 2005
-
In: Vigiliae christianae (Print). - Leiden : Brill. - 0042-6032 .- 1570-0720. ; 59, s. 115-134
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The surviving witnesses to Basilides of Alexandria (fl. 120–140 C.E.) reflect considerable variety and confusion concerning his writing(s). Attempts by scholars to present Basilides as an exegete of Christian scripture, and even as the author of a Gospel, are based on precious little evidence, which scholars have at times misinterpreted. This article argues that only a limited interest in gospel materials on the part of Basilides can be demonstrated from the surviving portions of his Exegetica (Treatises). Moreover, if Basilides did indeed write a Gospel, it was not a narrative or sayings Gospel concerned primarily with the life or the teachings of Jesus. Finally, prior to Origen in the mid-third century C.E. the designation (or title) Exegetica did not connote an ‘exegetical’ commentary. Clement of Alexandria’s title for Basilides’s work (Exegetica, Strom. 4.81.1) instead supports the inference that this writing comprised “explanations” of Basilides’s theological system.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
