1.
Jerkeman, Mats, et al.
(författare)
Health-related quality of life and its potential prognostic implications in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a Nordic Lymphoma Group Trial
2001
Ingår i: Medical Oncology. - 1559-131X. ; 18:1, s. 85-94
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat) abstract
This study was conducted to explore treatment and disease-related effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with aggressive lymphoma, to identify predictors for impaired long-term HRQoL, and to analyze the prognostic value of pretreatment HRQoL. Ninety-five patients with aggressive lymphoma, constituting a subset of a randomized multicenter trial comparing CHOP and MACOP-B, entered a HRQoL study, using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Patient scores were compared to scores from an age- and gender-adjusted reference population sample, and evaluation of the prognostic value of pretreatment QoL scores in relation to clinical prognostic factors was performed. Before treatment, patients exhibited lower scores of global QoL, physical, role, and social functions, and more appetite loss, compared to the reference population. Role functioning improved compared to baseline, but remained depressed compared to the reference group more than 8 mo after end of treatment. By then, the patient group displayed no difference in other HRQoL variables compared to that of the reference population. No reliable predictor for impaired long-term HRQoL could be identified. In multivariate analysis, including the factors of the International Prognostic Index, pretreatment global QoL was an independent prognostic marker for overall survival. In conclusion, in this population with aggressive lymphoma and favorable prognostic features, HRQoL was not substantially affected during the first year after diagnosis. Pretreatment global QoL may constitute a significant prognostic factor, meriting further investigation in prospective studies.
2.
Messori, A, et al.
(författare)
Survival in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regimens with CHOP
2001
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1532-1827. ; 84:3, s. 303-307
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat) abstract
In patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), third generation chemotherapy regimens have been introduced to improve survival in comparison with the standard CHOP regimen. However, most studies have found no difference between these two treatments. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of third generation regimens as compared with CHOP. Our study included the randomized controlled trials published in English from 1970 to 1999. After a Medline search, 5 trials were found to meet our inclusion criteria. A total of 1982 patients, that were enrolled in these trials, were included in the survival meta-analysis. Our methodology retrieved patient-level information from all of these subjects; survival up to 9 years after randomization was compared between the two treatment options. The results of our meta-analysis showed that, in comparison with CHOP, third generation chemotherapy did not prolong survival at levels of statistical significance (chi-square by log-rank test = 1.44, P = 0.23). The relative death risk for third generation regimens vs. CHOP was 0.92 (95%CI: 0.80 to 1.06;P = 0.26). We conclude that, on the basis of our meta-analysis, third generation regimens do not confer any survival benefit to patients with intermediate or high grade NHL as compared with CHOP.
