| 1. |
- Qviström, Mattias, et al.
(författare)
-
Urban sprawl på skånska? : om planeringsdebattens språkbruk och begreppens dolda landskap
- 2016
-
Ingår i: LTV-fakultetens faktablad.
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- För att främja en hållbar utveckling behöver dagens planerare lära av internationella exempel. Men hur? Artikeln diskuterar fallgropar och möjligheter i ett ömsesidigt lärande, utifrån pågående forskningsprojekt om stadsutglesning. Vi argumenterar för att planerare måste ta hänsyn till att ett begrepp förmedlar ett visst landskap, och att det kan dölja lika mycket som det visar fram.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Qviström, Mattias
(författare)
-
Putting accessibility in place: A relational reading of accessibility in policies for transit-oriented development
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Geoforum. - : Elsevier BV. - 0016-7185. ; 58, s. 166-173
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In order to facilitate sustainable development, a shift from mobility-based to accessibility-based planning has been suggested. However, if we rely on the modern conceptualisation of accessibility, such a shift would have limited results. As an alternative, this paper proposes a relational reading of accessibility, which questions the divide between mobility and place upon which the modern definition is based. It argues that the accessibility of a place is characterised by a specific coordination of presences and absences that depends as much on boundaries and exclusions as on mobility. If accessibility changes, so does the place. This interpretation makes accessibility a matter of priorities and provides a critical perspective on arguments for time-space compressions and progress. This is illustrated here using the example of a regional strategy for transit-oriented development in Sweden (Region Scania). For that case, the discourse on accessibility revealed simplified arguments for densification, progress and metropolitan ideals, contradicting the initial inclusive intentions of the strategy. Thus, there is a need to put accessibility in place so that a shift to accessibility-based planning facilitates a move towards social and environmental sustainability. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Qviström, Mattias, et al.
(författare)
-
What Kind of Transit-Oriented Development? Using Planning History Differentiate a Model for Sustainable Development
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Planning Studies. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0965-4313 .- 1469-5944. ; 23, s. 2516-2534
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Transit-oriented development (TOD) is frequently cited as a planning strategy which facilitates sustainability transitions on urban and regional levels. Its supporters emphasize its innovative nature, but this tends to downplay the importance of the long history of transit-oriented strategies. This study examined whether scrutinizing planning history, particularly regarding rural-urban interplay, can differentiate TOD strategies and facilitate a discussion on desirable kinds of future TOD. The analysis used the case of the town Skurup in Sweden, tracing its partial dependencies on past planning and urban development through archival studies, maps, interviews and field studies. Particular attention was paid to the establishment of the rurban village in the late 19th century and to modern planning in the 1960s. It was concluded that the divergence from the TOD strategy of the former period and the similarities with modern planning need to be critically discussed in developing future TOD strategies. Based on the case, strategies for going beyond modern planning and referring more clearly to earlier TOD approaches are suggested, not least in order to maintain the cultural heritage of the town and its hinterland.
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
