| 1. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
A Note on Optimal Taxation, Status Consumption, and Unemployment
- 2020
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Existing research on optimal taxation in economies with status-driven relative consumption assumes that the labor market is competitive, despite the fact that real world labor markets are typically characterized by involuntary unemployment. We show how the marginal tax policy ought to be modified to simultaneously account for positional consumption externalities and equilibrium unemployment, and find that interaction effects between these two market failures are crucial determinants of the marginal tax structure. In certain cases, the policy incentive to tax away positional externalities vanishes completely, and negative positional externalities may even lead to lower marginal taxation, under involuntary unemployment.
|
|
| 2. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Adaptation, Anticipation-Bias and Optimal Income Taxation
- 2012
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Adaptation is omnipresent but people systematically fail to correctly anticipate the degree to which they adapt. This leads individuals to make inefficient intertemporal decisions. This paper concerns optimal income taxation to correct for such anticipation-biases in a framework where consumers adapt to earlier consumption levels through a habit-formation process. The analysis is based on a general equilibrium OLG model with endogenous labor supply and savings where each consumer lives for three periods. Our results show how a paternalistic government may correct for the effects of anticipation-bias through a combination of time-variant marginal labor income taxes and savings subsidies. Furthermore, the optimal policy mix remains the same, irrespective of whether consumers commit to their original life-time plan for work hours and savings decided upon in the first period of life or re-optimize later on when realizing the failure to adapt.
|
|
| 3. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Adaptation, taxation and public goods
- 2014
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This paper shows how the first-best and second-best rules for optimal public good provision depend on the adaptation to private and public consumption. Adaptation in private consumption typically leads to over-provision relative to the Samuelson condition, while adaptation in public consumption works the other way around. The two sources of adaptation only cancel out in the extreme case of full adaptation.
|
|
| 4. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Alternative parametric bunching estimators of the ETI
- 2018
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- We propose a maximum likelihood (ML) based method to improve the bunching approach of measuring the elasticity of taxable income (ETI), and derive the estimator for several model settings that are prevalent in the literature, such as perfect bunching, bunching with optimization frictions, notches, and heterogeneity in the ETI. We show that the ML estimator is more precise and likely less biased than ad-hoc bunching estimators that are typically used in the literature. In the case of optimization frictions in the form of random shocks to earnings, the ML estimation requires a prior of the average size of such shocks. The results obtained in the presence of a notch can differ substantially from those obtained using ad-hoc approaches. If there is heterogeneity in the ETI, the elasticity of the individuals who bunch exceeds the average elasticity in the population.
|
|
| 5. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Charity as income redistribution : a model with optimal taxation, status, and social stigma
- 2019
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In light of the increasing inequality in many countries, this paper analyzes redistributive charitable giving from the rich to the poor in a model of optimal nonlinear income taxation. Our framework integrates (i) public and private redistribution, (ii) the warm glow of giving and stigma of receiving charitable donations, and (iii) status concerns emanating from social comparisons with respect to charitable donations and private consumption. Whether charity should be taxed or supported largely depends on the relative strengths of the warm glow of giving and the stigma of receiving charity, respectively, and on the positional externalities caused by charitable donations. In addition, imposing stigma on the mimicker (which relaxes the self-selection constraint) strengthens the case for subsidizing charity. We also consider a case where the government is unable to target the charitable giving through a direct tax instrument, and we examine how the optimal marginal income tax structure should be adjusted in response to charitable giving. Numerical simulations demonstrate that the quantitative effects of the aforementioned mechanisms can be substantial.
|
|
| 6. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Charity, status, and optimal taxation : welfarist and paternalist approaches
- 2019
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This paper deals with tax policy responses to charitable giving, defined in terms of voluntary contributions to a public good, to which the government also contributes through public revenue; the set of tax instruments contains general, nonlinear taxes on income and charitable giving. In addition to consumption, leisure and a public good, individuals obtain utility from the warm glow of giving and social status generated by their relative contributions to charity as well as their relative consumption compared with others. We analyze the conditions under which it is optimal to tax or subsidize charitable giving and derive corresponding optimal policy rules. Another aim of the paper is to compare the optimal tax policy and public good provision by a conventional welfarist government with those by two kinds of paternalist governments: The first kind does not respect the consumer preferences for status in terms of relative giving and relative consumption, while the second kind in addition does not respect preferences for warm glow of giving. The optimal policy rules for marginal taxation and public good provision are similar across governments, except for the stronger incentive to tax charitable giving at the margin under the more extensive kind of paternalism. Numerical simulations supplement the theoretical results.
|
|
| 7. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Charity, Status, and Optimal Taxation: Welfarist and Non-Welfarist Approaches
- 2021
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This paper analyzes optimal taxation of charitable giving to a public good in a Mirrleesian framework with social comparisons. Leisure separability together with zero transaction costs of giving imply that charitable giving should be subsidized to such an extent that governmental contributions are completely crowded out, regardless of whether the government acknowledges warm glows of giving. Stronger concerns for relative charitable giving and larger transaction costs support lower marginal subsidies, whereas relative consumption concerns work in the other direction. A dual screening approach, where charitable giving constitutes an indicator of wealth, is also presents. Numerical simulations supplement the theoretical results.
|
|
| 8. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Climate change and psychological adaptation : a behavioral environmental economics approach
- 2014
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Economic models of climate policy (or policies to combat other environmental problems) typically neglect psychological adaptation to changing life circumstances. People may adapt or become more sensitive, to different degrees, to a deteriorated environment. The present paper addresses these issues in a simple model of tax policy to combat climate change and elaborates on the consequences for optimal climate policies, and argues from a normative point of view that psychological adaptation needs to be taken into account by a pure welfarist government, which aims at internalizing an intertemporal externality.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Aronsson, Thomas, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Federal Governments Should Subsidize State Expenditure that Voters do not Consider when Voting
- 2014
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This short paper analyzes whether a federal transfer system can be designed to increase welfare, when state governments create political budget cycles to increase the likelihood of reelection. The results show how the federal government may announce a transfer scheme in advance for the post-election year that counteracts the welfare costs of political budget cycles.
|
|
