| 1. |
- Johansson Wilén, Evelina, 1985-, et al.
(författare)
-
Till ideologikritikens försvar
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Evelina Johansson Wilén, Tomas Wedin och Carl Wilén (red.), Ideologikritik. - Lund : Studentlitteratur. - 9789144139883 ; , s. 277-308
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Johansson Wilén, Evelina, 1985-, et al.
(författare)
-
Ideologikritikens återkomst
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Evelina Johansson Wilén, Tomas Wedin och Carl Wilén (red.), Ideologikritik. - Lund : Studentlitteratur. - 9789144139883 ; , s. 17-44
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Munthe, Christian, 1962, et al.
(författare)
-
The Best Interest of Children and the Basis of Family Policy: The Issue of Reproductive Caring Units
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Cutas, D & Chan, S (eds.). Families: Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. - London and New York : Bloomsbury Academic. - 9781780930107
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The notion of the best interest of children figures prominently in family and reproductive policy discussions and there is a considerable body of empirical research attempting to connect the interests of children to how families and society interact. Most of this research regards the effects of societal responses to perceived problems in families, thus underlying policy on interventions such as adoption, foster care and temporary assumption of custodianship, but also support structures that help families cope with various challenges. However, reference to the best interest of children can also be applied to a more basic issue in family policy, namely that of what is to be considered a family in the first place. This issue does not raise any questions regarding the proper conditions for when society should intervene in or change the family context of a child. Rather, it is about what social configurations should be recognized as a potentially fitting context for children to enter into and (if all goes well) eventually develop into adulthood within /.../ such that society’s default institutional arrangements allow it to have (by sexual and artificial reproduction, adoption, and combinations of these), care for and/or guard children. [This] will frame any further discussion of /.../ policies having further implications for, for example, the practices of adoption and reproductive technology, as well as regulation of custody in the event of separation or parental disagreement.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
What Does E- add to Democracy? : Designing an Agenda for Democracy Theory In the Information Age
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Transforming Politics and Policy in the Digital Age. - Hershey, PA : IGI Global. - 9781466660380 - 1466660384 - 9781466660397 ; , s. 200-223
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Technologies carry politics since they embed values. It is therefore surprising that mainstream political and legal theory have taken the issue so lightly. Compared to what has been going on over the past few decades in the other branches of practical thought, namely ethics, economics, and the law, political theory lags behind. Yet the current emphasis on Internet politics that polarizes the apologists holding the Web to overcome the one-to-many architecture of opinion building in traditional representative democracy, and the critics who warn that cyber-optimism entails authoritarian technocracy has acted as a wake up call. This chapter sets the problem, “What is it about ICTs, as opposed to previous technical devices, that impact on politics and determine uncertainty about democratic matters?,” into the broad context of practical philosophy by offering a conceptual map of clusters of micro-problems and concrete examples relating to “e-democracy.” The point is to highlight when and why the hyphen of e-democracy has a conjunctive or a disjunctive function in respect to stocktaking from past experiences and settled democratic theories. The chapter's claim is that there is considerable scope to analyse how and why online politics fail or succeed. The field needs both further empirical and theoretical work.
|
|
| 8. |
- Brax, David, 1979
(författare)
-
Hatbrottslagstiftning i Sverige och i Europa
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Förhoppningar och farhågor - Sveriges första 20 år i EU. - Göteborg : University of Gothenburg. - 9189608364 ; , s. 181-196
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 9. |
- Noll, Gregor, 1964, et al.
(författare)
-
Visions
- 2019
-
Ingår i: War and algorithm / Edited by Max Liljefors, Gregor Noll and Daniel Steuer. - London/New York : Rowman & Littlefield International. - 9781786613646 ; , s. 191-204
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 10. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
Austin and Scandinavian Realism
- 2013
-
Ingår i: The Legacy of John Austin's Jurisprudence. - : Springer-Verlag New York. ; , s. 73-106
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The imperative theory of law exemplified in the work of John Austin is the object of much criticism in the movement of Scandinavian legal realism (SLR). The very core notions of command, sovereignty and will are targeted. This paper explores the Scandinavian readings of Austin’s theory, chiefly by reconstructing the main arguments of Axel Hägerström’s criticism of the will-theory and Karl Olivecrona’s reading of the imperative character of law. Special attention is paid to the affinities between the various outlooks and to their core differences. On one hand, strong resemblances can be discovered in the common methodological afflatus and respect for Hume’s principle. On the other hand – apart from contrasting opinions on minor aspects (such as tacit consent grounding custom) – among the unbridgeable divergences mention should be made of the view on morals: Austin embraced a form of cognitivism, while the Scandinavians supported a strict form of non-cognitivism. In order to assess the originality of the Scandinavian attack on the imperative theory of law, the aim of the paper is to test to what extent it stimulated the seminal work on the question of law’s authoritative dimension in SLR.
|
|
