| 1. |
- Rejmer, Annika, et al.
(författare)
-
Gemensam vårdnad kan skada
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Dagens nyheter. - Stockholm : AB Dagens nyheter. - 1101-2447. ; :1999-07-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 2. |
- Enqvist, Lena, Juris doktor, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Employee Health Data in European Law : Privacy is (not) an Option?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Nordic Journal of European Law. - : Nordic Journal of European Law, Lund University. - 2003-1785. ; 5:1, s. 40-66
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- While there are many feasible reasons for employers to process employee health data, the protection of such data is a fundamental issue for ensuring employee rights to privacy in the workplace. The sharing of health data within workplaces can lead to various consequences, such as losing a sense of privacy, stigmatisation, job insecurity and social dumping. At the European level, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)–two interconnected instruments–offer the most enforceable protection of employee health data. The article analyses the limits of employees’ right to privacy regarding health data, as delineated by the ECHR and GDPR. Using three fictive examples, we illustrate how the level of protection differs in these two instruments. In particular, we show that the protection of health data offered by the GDPR is seen as an objective act of processing at the time it is carried out, where the actual impact caused by the processing on private life is not considered. On the contrary, the ECHR’s applicability and offered level of protection in the employment context depend on subjective factors, such as the consequences of sharing the data.
|
|
| 3. |
- Kukkonen, Matti, et al.
(författare)
-
Taxation of Partnership - Economic national reports for the Nordic Tax Research Council's annual meeting, 2015 in Aarhus
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Nordic Tax Journal. - : Walter de Gruyter GmbH. - 2246-1809. ; 2015:2, s. 109-142
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This joint report includes economic national reports on the taxation of partnership in the Nordic countries, except Denmark. The general contents of these reports are summarized and thoroughly analyzed in Anna Holst Birket-Smith’s General report, published in this issue of the NTaxJ. For additional information, details on legislative measures etc. we find it important, however, to also publish the national reports in full length. We hope you will find it valuable as well. The respective national reports appear in alphabetic order, in regard to the country which regulation is presented. Name of the country reporter and contact information are presented in the beginning of each report.
|
|
| 4. |
- Litins'ka, Yana
(författare)
-
Assessing Capacity to Decide on Medical Treatment: On Human Rights and the Use of Medical Knowledge in the Laws of England, Russia and Sweden
- 2018
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- To provide a valid consent to – or refusal of – medical intervention, a patient must be legally capable to decide. This dissertation evaluates and compares when the assessment of mental abilities to refuse – or consent to – somatic medical intervention is required in England, Russia and Sweden, and what criteria must be applied to assess the ability to decide about somatic medical interventions in these legal orders. Two standards are used for evaluation and comparison. These standards are consistency with scientific knowledge of the decision-making process, and compliance with the United Nations and the Council of Europe human rights law requirements. The evaluation and comparison of the national legal orders seek to highlight the solutions and the potential difficulties that the domestic legal systems face when they attempt to realise the two standards.The analysis in the thesis indicates that the United Nations and the Council of Europe treaty bodies have chosen different approaches as to permissibility of capacity assessment procedures. It is argued that after adoption of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), the capacity assessments of adults should not be allowed in healthcare.A number of common problems within the selected legal systems are identified and analysed in the thesis. The question of when capacity assessments must start has not yet received much attention at national levels, which results in an absence of foreseeability and a possibility for discriminating against patients on the grounds of disability or health. The thesis highlights the fact that the national law requirements to draw a distinction between mental and somatic disorders/care are particularly problematic, and may lead to arbitrariness. The questions as to the legal classification of capacity assessment procedures (whether they are medical interventions or the collection of personal data), and accordingly, the legal status of refusal or absence of consent are also poorly foreseeable, which may lead to a violation of the patient’s right to privacy.The analysis shows that the criteria for capacity assessments are regulated in a manner that inevitably leads to arbitrariness when deciding whether a patient can make healthcare decisions. It was shown that the criteria are interpreted differently by various actors, and no agreement as to the required level of performance is reached. It is also argued that capacity assessments rarely allow for achieving the goal of checking whether or not a patient can choose what to do with his or her own body.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Selberg, Niklas, et al.
(författare)
-
Inför specialister i arbetsrätt i EU-domstolen
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Lag & avtal: arbetsrättslig tidskrift. - 0349-7143. ; :6, s. 40-41:6, s. 40-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
