| 1. |
- Rejmer, Annika, et al.
(författare)
-
Gemensam vårdnad kan skada
- 1999
-
Ingår i: Dagens nyheter. - Stockholm : AB Dagens nyheter. - 1101-2447. ; :1999-07-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 2. |
- Öberg, Jacob, 1982-
(författare)
-
Subsidiarity and EU Procedural Criminal Law
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Criminal Law Review. - Oxford : Hart Publishing Ltd. - 2191-7442 .- 2193-5505. ; 5:1, s. 19-45
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article examines how subsidiarity can limit the exercise of EU procedural criminal law competence. It argues for a narrow understanding of subsidiarity, suggesting that EU procedural criminal law legislation can only be directed at problems which are of a cross-border nature. By analysing a specific piece of EU legislation, the new Victims Directive, it is shown how the subsidiarity principle can be enforced. The article sustains that the Victims Directive can be criticised on subsidiarity grounds as the directive fails to adequately account for the link between victim rights and the application of the principle of mutual recognition, since the directive fails to explain properly the need to regulate local victim rights. The article also draws some broader reflections on the justifications for EU harmonization. It is argued that EU initiatives in procedural criminal law have not primarily been driven by the need to facilitate mutual recognition and free movement but rather motivated by a general concern to deliver a common European sense of justice. Whilst this approach from the EU legislator can be justified from a moral perspective, it flies in the face of the idea that decisions should be taken as closely as possible in respect of citizens.
|
|
| 3. |
- Öberg, Jacob, 1982-
(författare)
-
Subsidiarity as a Limit to the Exercise of EU Competences
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Yearbook of European Law. - Oxford : Oxford University Press. - 0266-7223 .- 0263-3264 .- 2045-0044. ; 36, s. 391-420
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article examines how subsidiarity can limit the exercise of EU competence. It suggests that the problems of reconstructing subsidiarity cannot be seen in isolation from the issue of judicial review. In a substantive sense it contends that subsidiarity can be reconceptualised as a principle that challenges the internal market justification for exercise of Union competences. It argues for a narrow understanding of subsidiarity, suggesting the EU legislator to demonstrate the risk or the existence of a transnational market failure or a transnational interest in order to substantiate EU harmonization. From the perspective of judicial enforcement the key argument is to change the focus from ‘substantive review’ to ‘procedural review’ of subsidiarity in order to meet institutional concerns. The proposed standard of review suggests that the EU legislator must offer ‘adequate reasoning’ and ‘relevant evidence’ to maintain that EU legislation conforms to the subsidiarity principle.
|
|
| 4. |
- Gerell, Manne, et al.
(författare)
-
Open drug markets, vulnerable neighbourhoods and gun violence in two Swedish cities
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1833-5330 .- 2159-5364. ; 16:3, s. 223-244
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Gun violence is a serious issue in many countries across the globe. It has been shown that there is an elevated risk for a further shooting nearby within a short time span of a shooting incident, so-called near-repeat patterning. The present study presents new evidence on near-repeat patterning in Sweden, with a focus on neighbourhoods which the police have labelled as ‘vulnerable’ – deprived neighbourhoods where criminal networks have a large impact on local communities. Such neighbourhoods tend to have open drug markets, and to have high levels of gun violence. The present paper analyses the association of open drug markets and vulnerable neighbourhoods with gun violence and near-repeat patterning of gun violence in two Swedish cities. Our findings suggest that gun violence is strongly concentrated on open drug markets in vulnerable neighbourhoods, and that those locations in addition exhibit high risks for repeat shootings after an initial shooting event. We propose that the police can use this knowledge to improve practices to prevent or disrupt gun violence.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Adestam, Johan, 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
Avtalsrättsligt medhjälparansvar
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Svensk Juristtidning. - 0039-6591. ; 2022:1, s. 98-123
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Det inomobligatoriska medhjälparansvaret har länge ansetts bygga på oskrivna tillräknanderegler. Anta att B anlitar C för att utföra något som uppfyller B:s avtalsförpliktelse mot A och att C orsakar A skada genom handlingen eller underlåtelsen H. Frågan om B:s skadeståndsansvar mot A ska enligt dessa regler avgöras på samma sätt som om B själv hade företagit H. De centrala frågorna blir då om H strider mot någon avtalsförpliktelse som B har mot A och om C har företagit H på ett sådant sätt att den i relationen mellan A och B tillämpliga ansvarsgrunden (t.ex. oaktsamhet) är uppfylld. Den traditionella bilden har emellertid utmanats i litteraturen och även i prejudikatet NJA 2018 s. 301. Artikeln argumenterar för att de konkurrerande beskrivningarna är omotiverade och att gällande rätt alltjämt svarar mot den traditionella bilden.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Bønsing, Sten, et al.
(författare)
-
Status and Criminal Liability of Civil Servants in Modern Public Administration : A Comparative Study of Denmark, Finland, and Sweden
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Public Law. - 1354-3725. ; 29:1, s. 115-134
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Accountability is a central topic in administrative law. To hold persons and institutions executing public power legally accountable in various ways is linked to ideas of good governance, democracy, legitimacy, and the rule of law. In the last decades, established structures for accountability in the public sector have been challenged through processes of privatization of public services, digitalization and a trend of flexibilization of the employment status of civil servants. All these developments are closely related to the impact of Europeanization. Among the various tools for accountability, criminal liability for public officials constitutes the most far-reaching form of measures from the perspective of the individual. The aim of this comparative study is to draw conclusions on the challenges in defining the legal status and the scope for the criminal liability of civil servants against the background of the developments just mentioned. The choice to study three Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland and Sweden) is made against the background of the Nordic countries all being highly ranked in international surveys of democracy and the rule of law. Alongside introducing Nordic solutions for the modern liabilitychallenges, the study points out development trends driven by europeanization, which bring new elements into Nordic thinking.
|
|
| 9. |
- Enell, Sofia, et al.
(författare)
-
Rättigheter som ”token”, egenansvar och egenvärde – : Barn och ungas förståelse av rättigheter i låst institutionsvård
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Nordisk socialrättslig tidskrift. - : Stockholms universitet. - 2000-6500. ; :2023 35-36, s. 7-38
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In Sweden, the recent debate on youth crime has focused on strengthening repressive measures. At the same time, government work is underway to strengthen children’s rights. Young people who are placed for the purpose of care in secure youth care (locked institutions) are placed at the intersection of these two trends. Starting from a critical children’s rights perspective, we explore how young people understand rights in a secure care environment and discuss how these understandings relates to central principals, laws and conventions. We start from the concrete situations and contexts in which rights are to be realized in order to contribute to a better understanding of the importance of rights in a secure care environment. The empirical data consists of 15 youth interviews, at four institutions. Three understandings of rights are identified; rights as tokens where rights are seen as something symbolic and without meaning, rights as self-responsibility where rights are seen as conditional on the young people’s actions and, rights as fundamental value where rights are understood as respect for one’s own and others’ human dignity, regardless of their actions. The three understandings of rights can be linked to different care contexts and to the relationship between staff and young people. Taken together, the young people’s understandings highlight the importance of basic principles of dignity and respect on equal terms, as well as the right of children deprived of their liberty to be helped to reintegrate into society. Implications for the operation of secure youth care are highlighted.
|
|
| 10. |
- Enqvist, Lena, Juris doktor, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Employee Health Data in European Law : Privacy is (not) an Option?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Nordic Journal of European Law. - : Nordic Journal of European Law, Lund University. - 2003-1785. ; 5:1, s. 40-66
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- While there are many feasible reasons for employers to process employee health data, the protection of such data is a fundamental issue for ensuring employee rights to privacy in the workplace. The sharing of health data within workplaces can lead to various consequences, such as losing a sense of privacy, stigmatisation, job insecurity and social dumping. At the European level, the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR) and EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)–two interconnected instruments–offer the most enforceable protection of employee health data. The article analyses the limits of employees’ right to privacy regarding health data, as delineated by the ECHR and GDPR. Using three fictive examples, we illustrate how the level of protection differs in these two instruments. In particular, we show that the protection of health data offered by the GDPR is seen as an objective act of processing at the time it is carried out, where the actual impact caused by the processing on private life is not considered. On the contrary, the ECHR’s applicability and offered level of protection in the employment context depend on subjective factors, such as the consequences of sharing the data.
|
|
