SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

hsv:(SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP) hsv:(Juridik)
 

Search: hsv:(SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP) hsv:(Juridik) > Uppsala University > Örebro University > Agricultural Sciences > Dissimilar framings...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Dissimilar framings of forest biodiversity preservation : Uncertainty and legal ambiguity as contributing factors

Uggla, Ylva, 1960- (author)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap,CUReS,Univ Orebro, Sch Humanities Educ & Social Sci, SE-70182 Orebro, Sweden.
Forsberg, Maria (author)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Uppsala universitet,Juridiska institutionen,Centrum för biologisk mångfald,Swedish Biodiversity Centre,Uppsala University
Larsson, Stig (author)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences,Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet,Institutionen för ekologi,Department of Ecology
 (creator_code:org_t)
 
Elsevier, 2016
2016
English.
In: Forest Policy and Economics. - : Elsevier. - 1389-9341 .- 1872-7050. ; 62, s. 36-42
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Controversies over forestry and environmental issues, including biodiversity, are common. Theory suggests that uncertainty may play a major role in framing biodiversity and its preservation. This paper examines written statements on biodiversity preservation published by two major Swedish organizations, i.e., the Swedish Forest Industries Federation and the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation, with different interests in forest use. Frame analysis suggests that when the actors pursue a certain policy course, both biodiversity-related uncertainty and lack of regulatory clarity are important factors contributing to dissimilar framings. This case study supports the general understanding that biodiversity-related uncertainty can have important implications for biodiversity preservation, in this case, via forest policy and legislation. Scientific uncertainty may allow actors with dissimilar interests in an issue to justify their standpoints. To successfully manage forest biodiversity in the future, legal frameworks must increasingly find ways to accommodate scientific uncertainty, and models must be developed in which stakeholders’ diverging interests and values address uncertainties via dialogue.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Sociologi -- Sociologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Sociology -- Sociology (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Annan naturvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Other Natural Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Juridik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Law (hsv//eng)
LANTBRUKSVETENSKAPER  -- Lantbruksvetenskap, skogsbruk och fiske -- Skogsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES  -- Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries -- Forest Science (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Juridik -- Juridik och samhälle (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Law -- Law and Society (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Biologi -- Ekologi (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Biological Sciences -- Ecology (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Forestry
Biodiversity
Framing
Uncertainty
Regulation
Forest Policy
Sociologi
Sociology
Juridik
Law
Biology
Biologi

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view