SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "hsv:(SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP) hsv:(Juridik) ;pers:(Linderfalk Ulf)"

Sökning: hsv:(SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP) hsv:(Juridik) > Linderfalk Ulf

  • Resultat 1-10 av 83
  • [1]234567...9Nästa
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Linderfalk, Ulf, et al. (författare)
  • Chaps. 1-11, 15
  • 2012
  • Ingår i: Folkrätten i ett nötskal, 2 uppl. - Studentlitteratur AB. - 9789144079134
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt)
  •  
2.
  • Linderfalk, Ulf, et al. (författare)
  • Chapters 1-8, 11 and 13
  • 2006
  • Ingår i: Folkrätten i ett nötskal. - Studentlitteratur AB. - 91-44-00873-2
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt)
  •  
3.
  • Linderfalk, Ulf (författare)
  • All the Things That You Can Do With Jus Cogens: : A Pragmatic Approach to Legal Language
  • 2013
  • Ingår i: German Yearbook of International Law. - Institut für Internationales Recht an der Universität Kiel. - 0344-3094. ; 56, s. 351-386
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Investigating the meaning of conceptual terms is an important task for international legal scholars. In the analysis of the usage of conceptual terms in international legal discourse, traditionally, most international lawyers have confined studies to the descriptive meaning of those terms. They have assumed that conceptual terms describe a relationship between, on the one hand, the particular properties identifying a particular phenomenon or state of affairs as one that belongs to the extension of a particular concept, and on the other hand, the legally relevant inferences ensuing from the categorisation. While this theory works reasonably well as long as studies are confined to the meaning of conceptual terms in law, it is ill-suited for any similar study of international legal discourse. In the search for possible alternatives, this article adopts instead a pragmatic approach to legal language. More specifically, it equates the meaning of a conceptual term with its functionality, that is, with what the uttering of a conceptual term potentially does to the beliefs, attitudes, and behaviour of participants in international legal discourse. The investigation proceeds in two steps. As Section II argues, a functionality-based theory of meaning suggests a method (referred to throughout the article as functionality analysis) that can be used for the analysis of international legal discourse. Sections III, IV and V illustrate the ramifications of functionality analysis by applying it relative to the usage of one particular conceptual term, namely jus cogens.
  •  
4.
  • Linderfalk, Ulf (författare)
  • Cross-fertilization in international law
  • 2015
  • Ingår i: Nordic Journal of International Law. - Brill Academic Publishers. ; 84, s. 428-455
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
  •  
5.
6.
7.
  • Linderfalk, Ulf (författare)
  • Is Treaty Interpretation an Art or a Science? International Law and Rational Decision Making
  • 2015
  • Ingår i: European Journal of International Law. - Oxford University Press. - 1464-3596. ; 26:1, s. 169-189
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Although treaty interpretation is undoubtedly an activity governed by international law, and by Articles 31-33 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) in particular, some commentators continue repeating the pre-Vienna adage that treaty interpretation is a matter of art and not science, the implication of which is that no understanding of a treaty provision can ever be explained rationally. As the present article argues, this idea of interpretation must be rejected. While, sometimes, an assumed meaning of a treaty cannot be justified based on international law simpliciter, many times it can still be explained based on the structural framework of Articles 31-33 of the VCLT. Consequently, any characterization of treaty interpretation in the abstract as either art or science is misplaced. Whether treaty interpretation is an art or a science remains a question of fact inextricably tied to the approach taken by each and every law-applying agent in particular cases.
8.
  • Linderfalk, Ulf (författare)
  • Navigating the Legal Landscape between the General and the Specific : General Concepts as Tools of Legal Reasoning
  • 2017
  • Ingår i: International Community Law Review. - Brill Academic Publishers. - 1871-9740. ; 19:2-3, s. 302-323
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
    • The common practice of using general concepts as tools in legal reasoning is bound to raise questions concerning the relative importance of the general and the specific for the understanding of international law. To illustrate, this article uses two judgments handed down by the icty Trial Chamber. While for both judgments, the Chamber inferred from human rights instruments an alleged general concept of torture, which it then brought to bear on its understanding of the prohibition of torture contained in the laws and customs of war, it used the concept differently. The question that this article asks is whether this difference of approach can possibly be explained so as to reconcile the two judgments. Two mutually exclusive explanations are suggested. As argued, choosing between them presents a dilemma. The first explanation prompts us to accept the occurrence of irreconcilable conflicts between different jus cogens rules. The second explanation commits us to an unacceptably broad understanding of the jus cogens prohibition of torture.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  • Beckman, Olof, et al. (författare)
  • Humanitär rätt
  • 2006
  • Ingår i: Folkrätten i ett nötskal. - Studentlitteratur AB. - 9144008732 ; s. 169-176
  • Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt)
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 83
  • [1]234567...9Nästa
 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy