| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
La gestión privada del gobierno de Internet : La capacidad de autodeterminación en juego
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Revista de Estudios Políticos. - Madrid : Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales. - 0048-7694 .- 1989-0613. ; 173, s. 113-140
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To better understand what issues today’s technologies raise in relation to political liberty, understood as self-determination, attention should shift from the level of contents of the Internet to its more basic architecture and governance (critical internet resources [CIR], protocols, governance ecology, etc.). Mainstream political science has for a long time eschewed the field of Internet governance. There is nonetheless an interesting debate on how we should handle this new world we have in common that is constituted by the infosphere. The paper shows why the debate on the control of the Internet is often misleading: too much attention on traditional institutional actors has obscured the fact that the «seats of power» are now elsewhere. In order to move within the private ordering that currently characterizes Internet governance, in a way that is respectful of fundamental rights, we need to rethink the relationships between social powers.
|
|
| 4. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
La legislación en Hägerström
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Iuris Dictio. - : Universidad San Francisco de Quito. - 1390-6402 .- 2528-7834. ; 25:25, s. 141-163
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The relationship between law and politics is one of the most debated topics in legal theory. There is no consensus on the range and scope of the political and the legal element in law. Legislation or lawmaking is conceptually ambiguous because it indicates the law which has been promulgated, and therefore the primary object of many modern theories of law, but also the process of making it, that many theories of law usually locate outside the scope of jurisprudence and more specifically in the realm of politics. The first section sets the problem of legislation by distinguishing a number of different problems that often appear indistinctly under this label. Standpoints can be viewed according to a spectrum stretching from legal theories holding politics to essentially permeate the law to those claiming the opposite. The aim is to situate Hägerström’s view on law-making along this spectrum. My claim is that Scandinavian realism holds middle ground in that ideological constructs structurally affect the law yet legal normativity cannot be reduced to the will of de facto holders of power: law cannot be reduced to any idea of will, including that of the majority or of the people. To substantiate this claim the article investigates Hägerström’s view on the foundation of a new constitution pursuant to a political revolution, the ultimate touchstone for maintaining the (in)distinctiveness of law and politics. His bottom line is that the problem cannot be explained in terms of discovery of public interest, because of his non-cognitivist approach. But it cannot be explained in terms of decision-making either. Law-making here amounts to access and control of technical procedures grounded in a form of faith, or in his own terms “ideas governing men’s minds”.
|
|
| 5. |
- Forslund, Tommie, et al.
(författare)
-
El Apego Va a Juicio: Problemas de Custodia y Protección Infantil : [Attachment goes to court: Child protection and custody issues]
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Anuario de psicología jurídica. - : Colegio Oficial de la Psicologia de Madrid. - 1133-0740 .- 2174-0542. ; 32:1, s. 115-139
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Attachment theory and research are drawn upon in many applied settings, including family courts, but misunderstandings are widespread and sometimes result in misapplications. The aim of this consensus statement is, therefore, to enhance understanding, counter misinformation, and steer family-court utilisation of attachment theory in a supportive, evidence-based direction, especially with regard to child protection and child custody decision-making. This article is divided into two parts. In the first part, we address problems related to the use of attachment theory and research in family courts, and discuss reasons for these problems. To this end, we examine family court applications of attachment theory in the current context of the best-interest-of-the-child standard, discuss misunderstandings regarding attachment theory, and identify factors that have hindered accurate implementation. In the second part, we provide recommendations for the application of attachment theory and research. To this end, we set out three attachment principles: the child's need for familiar, non-abusive caregivers; the value of continuity of good-enough care; and the benefits of networks of attachment relationships. We also discuss the suitability of assessments of attachment quality and caregiving behaviour to inform family court decision-making. We conclude that assessments of caregiver behaviour should take center stage. Although there is dissensus among us regarding the use of assessments of attachment quality to inform child custody and child-protection decisions, such assessments are currently most suitable for targeting and directing supportive interventions. Finally, we provide directions to guide future interdisciplinary research collaboration.
|
|
| 6. |
- Parra Rosales, Luz Paula, 1968-, et al.
(författare)
-
Reforma Constitucional de Derechos Humanos en México
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Efective Incidence of NGOs in a Congress without Mayorities. - Mexico : Centro de Colaboración Cívica. ; , s. 1-35
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Después de más de 10 años de negociación política y de un proceso legislativo de tres años, finalmente el 11 de junio de 2011 entró en vigor la Reforma Constitucional en materia de Derechos Humanos en México. Miembros de organizaciones civiles, exfuncionarios de gobierno, legisladores, organismos internacionales, académicos y gran parte de la opinión pública coinciden en que se trata de una de las piezas de legislación más importantes que se han aprobado en los últimos tiempos en el país.En el entorno creado por las medidas de políticas públicas tomadas por el gobierno federal para el combate a la delincuencia organizada y ante el crecimiento del nivel de violencia a nivel nacional, la aprobación de la Reforma Constitucional en materia de Justicia Penal que entró en vigor en el año 2008 motivó la preocupación de algunas organizaciones civiles y de la Oficina del Alto Comisionado de los Derechos Humanos en México (OACNUDH), las cuales opinaban que esta legislación carecía de una perspectiva de derechos humanos que garantizara un balance al nuevo marco legal. Por lo tanto, consideraron urgente la aprobación de esta reforma, discutida desde hace mucho tiempo, pero que en esos momentos se percibía como necesaria para brindar protección a la ciudadanía ante la situación de inseguridad en el país.Diversos actores intervinieron durante la discusión de la Reforma Constitucional en materia de Derechos Humanos, sin embargo, la incidencia estratégica de algunas organizaciones civiles y organismos internacionales fue determinante a lo largo de todo el proceso de aprobación, pasando por su votación en la Cámara de Diputados y el Senado de la República, hasta llegar a su aprobación final en la mayoría de los congresos estatales del país y su promulgación por parte del Ejecutivo.
|
|
| 7. |
- Bartolomei, María Luisa
(författare)
-
La Dimensión Global y Sexual de la Ciudadanía en América Latina y los Derechos Humanos : El Caso Argentino
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Oñati Socio-Legal Series. - 2079-5971. ; 5:2, s. 418-446
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The paper discusses the issue of sexual violence against women during the past military dictatorships in Latin America, especially in Argentina, and some consequences in the current practice of their sexual and reproductive rights. It analyzes the extent the exercise of sexuality has a connection with the exercise of power, which organizes, manages, and prioritizes behavior depending on a political, social and cultural project, in a context of time and space. This means that the public and private, power and sexuality depend on the idea of the nation, class, race and religion, and consequently implies the political control of reproduction and the family model, including expressions of gender sexual violence. The paper discusses feminist theoretical concepts, such as the concept of gender and nation from an intersectional perspective (Yuval Davis), the idea of post colonialism and decolonization of feminism (Mohanty), and the relationship between gender and globalization (Fraser).
|
|
| 8. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
Hacia una teoría funcionalista de la ciudadanía
- 2019. - 1st
-
Bok (refereegranskat)abstract
- ¿Quién debe ser considerado un ciudadano? ¿Qué significa ser un ciudadano? ¿Cuáles son los mecanismos que regulan la inclusión y la exclusión de la ciudadanía? ¿Cómo se justifican y critican estos mecanismos? El libro presenta estudios sobre la ciudadanía con un enfoque multidisciplinar. El objetivo es reconstruir el debate con referencias a casos empíricos y permitir, a partir del análisis conceptual, una discusión de los principales modelos de ciudadanía y de las diversas formas que han asumido en la historia. La teoría funcional propuesta proporciona una herramienta para identificar cuándo se justifica o no la atribución de estatus. La obra es útil para aquellos que desean tener una base sólida para justificar opiniones y propuestas de políticas en el campo de la política de migración.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
