SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

hsv:(TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER) hsv:(Miljöbioteknik) hsv:(Bioteknisk etik)
 

Search: hsv:(TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER) hsv:(Miljöbioteknik) hsv:(Bioteknisk etik) > Kaye Jane > Feedback of Individ...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants : Is It Feasible in Europe?

Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle (author)
Mascalzoni, Deborah (author)
Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
Soini, Sirpa (author)
show more...
Machado, Helena (author)
Kaye, Jane (author)
Bentzen, Heidi Beate (author)
Rial-Sebbag, Emmanuelle (author)
D'Abramo, Flavio (author)
Witt, Michał (author)
Schamps, Geneviève (author)
Katić, Višnja (author)
Krajnovic, Dusanca (author)
Harris, Jennifer R (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Mary Ann Liebert Inc, 2016
2016
English.
In: Biopreservation and Biobanking. - : Mary Ann Liebert Inc. - 1947-5535 .- 1947-5543. ; 14:3, s. 241-248
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • BACKGROUND: There is growing consensus that individual genetic research results that are scientifically robust, analytically valid, and clinically actionable should be offered to research participants. However, the general practice in European research projects is that results are usually not provided to research participants for many reasons. This article reports on the views of European experts and scholars who are members of the European COST Action CHIP ME IS1303 (Citizen's Health through public-private Initiatives: Public health, Market and Ethical perspectives) regarding challenges to the feedback of individual genetic results to research participants in Europe and potential strategies to address these challenges.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consultation of the COST Action members was conducted through an email survey and a workshop. The results from the consultation were analyzed following a conventional content analysis approach.RESULTS: Legal frameworks, professional guidelines, and financial, organizational, and human resources to support the feedback of results are largely missing in Europe. Necessary steps to facilitate the feedback process include clarifying legal requirements to the feedback of results, developing harmonized European best practices, promoting interdisciplinary and cross-institutional collaboration, designing educational programs and cost-efficient IT-based platforms, involving research ethics committees, and documenting the health benefits and risks of the feedback process.CONCLUSIONS: Coordinated efforts at pan-European level are needed to enable equitable, scientifically sound, and socially robust feedback of results to research participants.

Subject headings

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Miljöbioteknik -- Bioteknisk etik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Biotechnology -- Bioethics (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view