| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Karlsson Minganti, Pia, 1967-
(författare)
-
Matrimoni contestati : Giovani musulmani in contesti transnazionali
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Mondi Migranti. - Milano : Franco Angeli. - 1972-4888. ; 11:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Nella ricerca accademica si presta sempre più attenzione al fenomeno del raggiungimento dell’età adulta tra i musulmani di seconda e terza generazione presenti in Europa. Quest’articolo tratta in particolare dei membri delle associazioni islamiche giovanili esistenti in Svezia e in Italia. Presenterò qui un mio nuovo progetto di ricerca, finalizzato allo studio delle trattative sulla pianificazione dei loro matrimoni: con chi, quando, dove e come. Le trattative in questione riguardano l’idea che i giovani hanno del matrimonio islamico, idea che si è venuta formando nel quadro delle emergenti sfere pubbliche dell'Islam. Inoltre, nelle negoziazioni sono coinvolti membri appartenenti a famiglie transnazionali e a network etnici, che hanno orientamenti religiosi diversi e diverse motivazioni nella pianificazione matrimoniale. Poiché i giovani musulmani vivono in Europa, i loro matrimoni sono influenzati anche dagli atteggiamenti e dalle condizioni della società che li circonda. Strutturato in forma di indagine comparata, questo progetto si basa su interviste di carattere qualitativo e osservazioni partecipative tra i giovani attivisti musulmani di due paesi europei: Svezia e Italia. La questione centrale delle trattative di matrimonio, è qui presa in esame a partire da ideali, desideri, obblighi e condizioni dei singoli giovani. Tale questione è intesa come un punto di osservazione strategico per l’esame degli aspetti significativi del cambiamento in corso. Da questo punto di osservazione, si ha modo di vedere come le azioni delle persone nella quotidianità si colleghino a processi societari di globalizzazione e alla riorganizzazione delle relazioni di genere.
|
|
| 3. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
Anatomia del cittadino : Tre modi di intendere la cittadinanza e alcuni problemi indesiderati
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Analisi & Diritto. - Barcelona : Editorial MARCIAL PONS. - 1126-5779. ; 1, s. 73-97
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This essay aims to distinguish analytically the meanings of “citizenship” in the contemporary debate. According to the semantic area of reference, citizenship stands for a political status referring to the individual’s position within the polity; a legal status referring to the overall position of a subject characterized by a determinate sphere of capacities; a social status indicating the ascribed or achieved position of a person within the social stratification in the group. After distinguishing the three semantic areas and specifying the methodology used, focus switches to the structure, genesis and internal composition of the semantic areas. These are subsequently summed up in a scheme that accounts for the basic problem that a given semantic area attempts to respond to. The purpose is to explain, on the basis of practical examples, why the distinction is important and why there is so much confusion in the current debate. In the last section, I suggest another distinction, inspired by Aristotle’s third book of Politics according to which we should distinguish between what the citizen is and who a citizen is. The stake of the issue is to inquire on the plausibility of assuming that a person has to enjoy a determinate attribute or capacity in order to have the right or the legal obligation implied by the status of citizenship.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
Ancora sulla teoria funzionale della cittadinanza. Risposta ai critici : More on the Functional Theory of Citizenship. Reply to critics
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Materiali per una storia della cultura giuridica. - : Societa Editrice Il Mulino. - 1120-9607. ; :2, s. 521-544
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper defends the functional theory of citizenship on the grounds of the conceptual map of contemporary models of citizenship that I have developed elsewhere. I address three different types of criticisms. First, the focus is on the arguments of those who believe the legal model of citizenship needs to be abandoned or rejected all together. Several reasons against this suggestion are highlighted. Second, a short discussion follows of some points made by those contributors to this volume who instead think that the legal model should be not be rejected, but that it still needs to be amended or requires development to fit contemporary migration patterns. Finally, I address the criticisms of those who believe the whole enterprise of developing a general theory of citizenship is flawed since there would be no concept of citizenship independently of political contingencies.
|
|
| 6. |
- Mindus, Patricia
(författare)
-
Doppiando il Capo Horn della scienza del diritto : Sull’oggettivismo post-metafisico quale fondamento del positivismo inclusivo
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Teoria Politica. - : Marcial Pons. - 0394-1248. ; :2, s. 143-160
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Inclusive legal positivism has been in the limelight for some time. There are several reasons for this. Among the structural reasons for this general change of direction within general jurisprudence are cultural changes such as the renewed interest for theory of action or normative methodology. This paper discusses José Juan Moreso’s contribution to this debate. The paper focuses especially on the thesis that there would be no connection between non-cognitivism as set out in meta-ethics and positivism in legal theory. This thesis is really the outcome of a compound of different positions: on the political level, the question concerns the possible relationships and tensions between democracy and liberalism. On the ethical and foremost meta-ethical level, the issue basically revolves around the relation between cognitivism and expressivism; and, on the level of legal theory, Moreso attempts to resolve the problem that Benedetto Croce, a century ago, compared to the difficulty of sailing around Cape Horn, i.e. to connect the law and ethics. The paper is divided into five sections. In the first section of the paper, a few historical remarks are made. In section two, I look at how natural law is defined in Moreso. In section three, some observations are made on how legal positivism is qualified in relation to natural law. In section four, I suggest a possible criticism of the conception of moral relativism used by Moreso and recommend an alternative conception that hopefully grasps further features of the way the problem is frequently discussed. Finally, some methodological remarks are made: the choice of disregarding the distinction between authentic and inauthentic normative propositions leads Moreso to conceive the object of dispute between cognitivists and expressivists in an unfruitful way. The lack of distinction between the role played by belief on the one hand and conative attitudes on the other makes it hard, if not impossible to grasp what exactly is the object of this dispute. In fact, their opposition, instead of representing a fertile scientific dialogue becomes similar to a situation where people are talking pass each other. If this outcome is to be avoided and the two positions reconstructed properly, an account of what constitutes belief should complement the theory. Probably greater focus is also needed on what is considered to be the primary function of normative propositions.
|
|
| 7. |
-
Paese che vai, manuale che trovi
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Paese che vai. - Firenze : Franco Cesati. - 9788876677021 ; , s. 17-29
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 8. |
- Pauletto, Franco, 1968-
(författare)
-
L’ordine sociale a tavola : L’interazione tra genitori e figli in famiglie italiane e svedesi
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This dissertation examines mealtime conversations between parents and children in eight Swedish and eight Italian middle class, dual-earner households, exploring the ways in which children are engaged in the cooperative construction of social order. The study is part of an international project (cf. Aronsson & Pontecorvo, 2002), coordinated with prior work in the US (cf. Ochs & Kremer-Sadlik, 2013).Study I explores how children’s accounts work during family dinner conversations. So called proto-accounts (laments, multiple repeats, want-statements) and varied verbal accounts are analyzed in relation to age class or prior language socialization experiences.Study II focuses on the use of endearment terms in directive sequences between parents and children. The findings show an asymmetrical distribution of endearment terms, in that only parents make use of them when interactional problems – children’s non-compliance with parental requests in particular – arise. Study III examines the ways in which Italian parents deploy the discourse marker dai (‘come on’) in directive sequences. This is a flexible linguistic resource that is employed by parents as a cajoling token when children fail to comply with parental requests, hindering the advancement of the in-progress activity.This thesis describes family mealtimes as parent-directed activities where sociality, morality and local understandings of the world (Ochs & Shohet, 2006) are collaboratively re-created and enacted. This confirms the crucial role of everyday family meals as rich cultural sites (Ochs & Shohet, 2006) for reasserting moral attitudes of the family: participants learn moment by moment how to be competent actors that are able to choose between alternative courses of action and that can therefore be held accountable for their actions (Bergmann, 1998: 284). From this point of view, a dinner is paradigmatic of the deep moral sense that permeates the making of a family.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Tralau, Johan
(författare)
-
L’icona del terrore e dell’ambiguità : Il legame mancante tra Hobbes ed il suo Leviatano
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Lo Sguardo – Rivista di Filosofia. - 2036-6558. ; XIII:3, s. 183-196
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Hobbes named his work Leviathan for a Biblical monster, yet he mentioned it only three times in the book itself. Curiously, in those three passages Hobbes speaks of Leviathan in wildly divergent ways: as a machine, man, sovereign, state, and god. In this article, the author argues that we can make sense of this radical ambiguity from a perspective found in the late Antique work Peri hermeneias. Specifically, ambiguity is taken to be conducive to fear, and Hobbes thus employs it as an instrument for the purpose of political obedience.
|
|
