SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:du-42164"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:du-42164" > Systematic review o...

Systematic review of interruptions in the emergency department work environment

Danesh, Valerie (författare)
Center for Applied Health Research, Baylor Scott & White Health, Dallas, nited States
Sasangohar, Farzan (författare)
A&M University, Houston, TX, United States
Källberg, Ann-Sofie (författare)
Högskolan Dalarna,Omvårdnad,Department of Emergency Medicine, Falun Hospital
visa fler...
Kean, Emily B. (författare)
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
Brixey, Juliana J. (författare)
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, United States
Johnson, Kimberly D. (författare)
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2022
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: International Emergency Nursing. - : Elsevier BV. - 1755-599X .- 1878-013X. ; 63
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to describe the operationalization of interruptions measurement and to synthesize the evidence on the causes and consequences of interruptions in the emergency department (ED) work environment. Methods: This systematic review of studies explores the causes and consequences of interruptions in the ED. Of 2836 abstract/titles screened, 137 full-text articles were reviewed, and 44 articles met inclusion criteria of measuring ED interruptions. Results: All articles reported primary data collection, and most were cohort studies (n = 30, 68%). Conceptual or operational definitions of interruptions were included in 27 articles. Direct observation was the most common approach. In half of the studies, quantitative measures of interruptions in the ED were descriptive only, without measurements of interruptions’ consequences. Twenty-two studies evaluated consequences, including workload, delays, satisfaction, and errors. Overall, relationships between ED interruptions and their causes and consequences are primarily derived from direct observation within large academic hospitals using heterogeneous definitions. Collective strengths of interruptions research in the ED include structured methods of naturalistic observation and definitions of interruptions derived from concept analysis. Limitations are conflicting and complex evaluations of consequences attributed to interruptions, including the predominance of descriptive reports characterizing interruptions without direct measurements of consequences. Conclusions: The use of standardized definitions and measurements in interruptions research could contribute to measuring the impact and influence of interruptions on clinicians’ productivity and efficiency as well as patients’ outcomes, and thus provide a basis for intervention research. © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

ED
Emergency department
Human factors
Interruptions
Systematic review
Work environment
adult
article
cohort analysis
concept analysis
emergency ward
female
human
male
outcome assessment
productivity
quantitative analysis
satisfaction
university hospital
workload
hospital emergency service
workplace
Emergency Service
Hospital
Humans

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy