SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hig-14246"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:hig-14246" > Bias and power in g...

Bias and power in group-based epidemiologic studies of low-back pain exposure and outcome : effects of study size and exposure measurement efforts

Coenen, Pieter (författare)
Curtin University, Perth, Australia; VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Body@Work, Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health, the Netherlands
Mathiassen, Svend Erik (författare)
Högskolan i Gävle,Arbetshälsovetenskap,Centrum för belastningsskadeforskning
Kingma, Idsart (författare)
VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Body@Work, Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health, the Netherlands
visa fler...
Boot, Cécile (författare)
Body@Work, Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health, the Netherlands; EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Bongers, Paulien (författare)
Body@Work, Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health, the Netherlands; TNO Healthy Living, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
van Dieën, Jaap (författare)
VU University Amsterdam, the Netherlands; King Abdulaziz University,Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-11-27
2015
Engelska.
Ingår i: Annals of Occupational Hygiene. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0003-4878 .- 1475-3162. ; 59:4, s. 439-454
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives: Exposure-outcome studies, for instance on work-related low-back pain (LBP), often classify workers into groups for which exposures are estimated from measurements on a sample of workers within or outside the specific study. The present study investigated the influence on bias and power in exposure-outcome associations of the sizes of the total study population and the sample used to estimate exposures.Methods: At baseline, lifting, trunk flexion, and trunk rotation were observed for 371 of 1131 workers allocated to 19 a-priori defined occupational groups. LBP (dichotomous) was reported by all workers during three years of follow-up. All three exposures were associated with LBP in this parent study (p<0.01).All 21 combinations of n=10,20,30 workers per group with an outcome, and k=1,2,3,5,10,15,20 workers actually being observed were investigated using bootstrapping, repeating each combination 10,000 times. Odds ratios (OR) with p-values were determined for each of these virtual studies. Average OR and statistical power (p<0.05 and p<0.01) was determined from the bootstrap distributions at each (n,k) combination.Results: For lifting and flexed trunk, studies including n≥20 workers, with k≥5 observed, led to an almost unbiased OR and a power >0.80 (p-level 0.05). A similar performance required n≥30 workers for rotated trunk. Small numbers of observed workers (k) resulted in biased OR, while power was, in general, more sensitive to the total number of workers (n).Conclusions: In epidemiologic studies using a group-based exposure assessment strategy, statistical performance may be sufficient if outcome is obtained from a reasonably large number of workers, even if exposure is estimated from only few workers per group.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Arbetsmedicin och miljömedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Occupational Health and Environmental Health (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

epidemiology
ergonomics
exposure
exposure assessment
group-based measurement strategy
low-back pain
musculoskeletal injury
precision

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy