SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-338258"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:kth-338258" > Carbon capture and ...

Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass - : Costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere

Azar, Christian (författare)
Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Phys Resource Theory, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Lindgren, Kristian (författare)
Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Phys Resource Theory, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
Larson, Eric (författare)
Princeton Environmental Inst., Guyot Hall, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ 08540, United States
visa fler...
Möllersten, Kenneth, 1966- (författare)
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg, Schlossplatz 1, Austria
visa färre...
Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Phys Resource Theory, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden Princeton Environmental Inst, Guyot Hall, Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ 08540, United States (creator_code:org_t)
2006-03-01
2006
Engelska.
Ingår i: Climatic Change. - : Springer Nature. - 0165-0009 .- 1573-1480. ; 74:1-3, s. 47-79
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The capture and storage of CO2 from combustion of fossil fuels is gaining attraction as a means to deal with climate change. CO2 emissions from biomass conversion processes can also be captured. If that is done, biomass energy with CO2 capture and storage (BECS) would become a technology that removes CO2 from the atmosphere and at the same time deliver CO2-neutral energy carriers (heat, electricity or hydrogen) to society. Here we present estimates of the costs and conversion efficiency of electricity, hydrogen and heat generation from fossil fuels and biomass with CO2 capture and storage. We then insert these technology characteristics into a global energy and transportation model (GET 5.0), and calculate costs of stabilizing atmospheric CO2 concentration at 350 and 450 ppm. We find that carbon capture and storage technologies applied to fossil fuels have the potential to reduce the cost of meeting the 350 ppm stabilisation targets by 50% compared to a case where these technologies are not available and by 80% when BECS is allowed. For the 450 ppm scenario, the reduction in costs is 40 and 42%, respectively. Thus, the difference in costs between cases where BECS technologies are allowed and where they are not is marginal for the 450 ppm stabilization target. It is for very low stabilization targets that negative emissions become warranted, and this makes BECS more valuable than in cases with higher stabilization targets. Systematic and stochastic sensitivity analysis is performed. Finally, BECS opens up the possibility to remove CO2 from the atmosphere. But this option should not be seen as an argument in favour of doing nothing about the climate problem now and then switching on this technology if climate change turns out to be a significant problem. It is not likely that BECS can be initiated sufficiently rapidly at a sufficient scale to follow this path to avoiding abrupt and serious climate changes if that would happen.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Naturresursteknik -- Energisystem (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Environmental Engineering -- Energy Systems (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy