SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-152081"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-152081" > Evaluating facts an...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Evaluating facts and facting evaluations: On the fact-value relationship in HTA

Hofmann, Bjorn (author)
Norwegian Univ Sci and Technol NTNU, Norway; Univ Oslo, Norway
Bond, Ken (author)
CADTH, Canada
Sandman, Lars (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys,Medicinska fakulteten
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018-04-03
2018
English.
In: Journal of Evaluation In Clinical Practice. - : WILEY. - 1356-1294 .- 1365-2753. ; 24:5, s. 957-965
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Health technology assessment (HTA) is an evaluation of health technologies in terms of facts and evidence. However, the relationship between facts and values is still not clear in HTA. This is problematic in an era of fake facts and truth production. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to clarify the relationship between facts and values in HTA. We start with the perspectives of the traditional positivist account of evaluating facts and the social-constructivist account of facting values. Our analysis reveals diverse relationships between facts and a spectrum of values, ranging from basic human values, to the values of health professionals, and values of and in HTA, as well as for decision making. We argue for sensitivity to the relationship between facts and values on all levels of HTA, for being open and transparent about the values guiding the production of facts, and for a primacy for the values close to the principal goals of health care, ie, relieving suffering. We maintain that philosophy (in particular ethics) may have an important role in addressing the relationship between facts and values in HTA. Philosophy may help us to avoid fallacies of inferring values from facts; to disentangle the normative assumptions in the production or presentation of facts and to tease out implicit value judgements in HTA; to analyse evaluative argumentation relating to facts about technologies; to address conceptual issues of normative importance; and to promote reflection on HTAs own value system. In this we argue for a(n Aristotelian) middle way between the traditional positivist account of evaluating facts and the social-constructivist account of facting values, which we call factuation. We conclude that HTA is unique in bringing together facts and values and that being conscious and explicit about this factuation is key to making HTA valuable to both individual decision makers and society as a whole.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Keyword

concepts; epistemology; ethics; evidence; facts; health technology assessment (HTA); philosophy; values

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Hofmann, Bjorn
Bond, Ken
Sandman, Lars
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
and Health Care Serv ...
Articles in the publication
Journal of Evalu ...
By the university
Linköping University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view