SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-182201"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-182201" > Co-designing implem...

Co-designing implementation strategies for the WALK-Cph intervention in Denmark aimed at increasing mobility in acutely hospitalized older patients : a qualitative analysis of selected strategies and their justifications

Kirk, Jeanette Wassar (författare)
Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Denmark; Aarhus Univ, Denmark
Nilsen, Per (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för samhälle och hälsa,Medicinska fakulteten
Andersen, Ove (författare)
Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Denmark
visa fler...
Powell, Byron J. (författare)
Washington Univ, MO 63110 USA
Tjornhoj-Thomsen, Tine (författare)
Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark
Bandholm, Thomas (författare)
Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Denmark; Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Denmark; Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Denmark
Pedersen, Mette Merete (författare)
Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Denmark
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-01-02
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMC Health Services Research. - : BMC. - 1472-6963. ; 22:1
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Selecting appropriate strategies to target barriers to implementing interventions represents a considerable challenge in implementation research and practice. The aim was to investigate what categories of implementation strategies were selected by health care practitioners and their managers in a co-design process and how they justified these strategies aimed at facilitating the implementation of the WALK-Cph intervention. Methods: The study used a qualitative research design to explore what implementation strategies were selected and the justifications for selecting these strategies. Workshops were used because this qualitative method is particularly well suited for studying co-design processes that involve substantial attention to social interaction and the context. Data were 1) analyzed deductively based on the Proctor et al. taxonomy of implementation strategies, 2) categorized in accordance with the ERIC compilation of implementation strategies by Powell et al., and 3) analyzed to examine the justification for the selected strategies by the Proctor et al. framework for justifications of implementation strategies. Results: Thirteen different types of implementation strategies were chosen across two hospitals. The deductive analysis showed that selection of implementation strategies was based on pragmatic and theoretical justifications. The contents of the two types of justifications were thematized into nine subthemes. Conclusion: This study contributes with knowledge about categories and justification of implementation strategies selected in a co-design process. In this study, implementation strategies were selected through pragmatic and theoretical justifications. This points to a challenge in balancing strategies based on practice-based and research-based knowledge and thereby selection of strategies with or without proven effectiveness.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy