SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-183266"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-183266" > Priority setting an...

Priority setting and equity in COVID-19 pandemic plans : a comparative analysis of 18 African countries

Kapiriri, Lydia (författare)
McMaster Univ, Canada
Kiwanuka, Suzanne (författare)
Makerere Univ, Uganda
Biemba, Godfrey (författare)
Natl Hlth Res Author, Zambia
visa fler...
Velez, Claudia (författare)
McMaster Univ, Canada
Razavi, S. Donya (författare)
McMaster Univ, Canada
Abelson, Julia (författare)
McMaster Univ, Canada
Essue, Beverly (författare)
St Michaels Hosp, Canada
Danis, Marion (författare)
NIH, MD 20812 USA
Goold, Susan (författare)
Univ Michigan, MI 48109 USA
Noorulhuda, Mariam (författare)
NIH, MD 20812 USA
Nouvet, Elysee (författare)
Western Univ, Canada
Sandman, Lars (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för samhälle och hälsa,Medicinska fakulteten
Williams, Ieystn (författare)
Univ Birmingham, England
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-10-07
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Health Policy and Planning. - : Oxford University Press. - 0268-1080 .- 1460-2237. ; 37:3, s. 297-309
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Priority setting represents an even bigger challenge during public health emergencies than routine times. This is because such emergencies compete with routine programmes for the available health resources, strain health systems and shift health-care attention and resources towards containing the spread of the epidemic and treating those that fall seriously ill. This paper is part of a larger global study, the aim of which is to evaluate the degree to which national COVID-19 preparedness and response plans incorporated priority setting concepts. It provides important insights into what and how priority decisions were made in the context of a pandemic. Specifically, with a focus on a sample of 18 African countries pandemic plans, the paper aims to: (1) explore the degree to which the documented priority setting processes adhere to established quality indicators of effective priority setting and (2) examine if there is a relationship between the number of quality indicators present in the pandemic plans and the countrys economic context, health system and prior experiences with disease outbreaks. All the reviewed plans contained some aspects of expected priority setting processes but none of the national plans addressed all quality parameters. Most of the parameters were mentioned by less than 10 of the 18 country plans reviewed, and several plans identified one or two aspects of fair priority setting processes. Very few plans identified equity as a criterion for priority setting. Since the parameters are relevant to the quality of priority setting that is implemented during public health emergencies and most of the countries have pre-existing pandemic plans; it would be advisable that, for the future (if not already happening), countries consider priority setting as a critical part of their routine health emergency and disease outbreak plans. Such an approach would ensure that priority setting is integral to pandemic planning, response and recovery.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Priority setting; equity; Africa region; COVID-19; national plans; effective priority setting

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy