SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-87966"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-87966" > Setting priorities ...

Setting priorities in primary health care - on whose conditions? A questionnaire study

Arvidsson, Eva (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Utvärdering och hälsoekonomi,Hälsouniversitetet
André, Malin (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Allmänmedicin och preventivmedicin,Uppsala University, Sweden
Borgquist, Lars (författare)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Allmänmedicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Forsknings- och utvecklingsenheten för Närsjukvården i Östergötland
visa fler...
Andersson, David (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Företagsekonomi,Tekniska högskolan
Carlsson, Per (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Utvärdering och hälsoekonomi,Hälsouniversitetet
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-11-26
2012
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMC Family Practice. - : BioMed Central. - 1471-2296. ; 13:114
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: In Sweden three key criteria are used for priority setting: severity of the health condition; patient benefit; and cost-effectiveness. They are derived from the ethical principles established by the Swedish parliament 1997 but have been used only to a limited extent in primary care. The aim of this study was to describe and analyse: 1) GPs, nurses, and patients prioritising in routine primary care 2) The association between the three key priority setting criteria and the overall priority assigned by the GPs and nurses to individual patients. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethods: Paired questionnaires were distributed to all patients and the GPs or nurses they had contact with during a 2-week period at four health centres in Sweden. The staff registered the health conditions or health problem, and the planned intervention. Then they estimated the severity of the health condition, the expected patient benefit, and the cost-effectiveness of the planned intervention. Both the staff and the patients reported their overall prioritisation of the patient. In total, 1851 paired questionnaires were collected. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: Compared to the medical staff, the patients assigned relatively higher priority to acute/minor conditions than to preventive check-ups for chronic conditions. Severity of the health condition was the priority setting criterion that had the strongest association with the overall priority for the staff as a whole, but for the GPs it was cost-effectiveness. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions: The challenge for primary care providers is to balance the patients demands with medical needs and cost-effectiveness. Transparent priority setting in primary care might contribute to a greater consensus between GPs and nurses on how to use the key priority setting criteria.

Nyckelord

MEDICINE
MEDICIN

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy