SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-95823"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:liu-95823" > Never the twain sha...

Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research

Nilsen, Per (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys,Hälsouniversitetet
Ståhl, Christian (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin,Hälsouniversitetet
Roback, Kerstin (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys,Hälsouniversitetet
visa fler...
Cairney, Paul (författare)
University of Stirling, Scotland
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013-06-10
2013
Engelska.
Ingår i: Implementation Science. - : BioMed Central. - 1748-5908. ; 8
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • BackgroundMany of society’s health problems require research-based knowledge acted on by healthcare practitioners together with implementation of political measures from governmental agencies. However, there has been limited knowledge exchange between implementation science and policy implementation research, which has been conducted since the early 1970s. Based on a narrative review of selective literature on implementation science and policy implementation research, the aim of this paper is to describe the characteristics of policy implementation research, analyze key similarities and differences between this field and implementation science, and discuss how knowledge assembled in policy implementation research could inform implementation science.DiscussionFollowing a brief overview of policy implementation research, several aspects of the two fields were described and compared: the purpose and origins of the research; the characteristics of the research; the development and use of theory; determinants of change (independent variables); and the impact of implementation (dependent variables). The comparative analysis showed that there are many similarities between the two fields, yet there are also profound differences. Still, important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research, including issues related to the influence of the context of implementation and the values and norms of the implementers (the healthcare practitioners) on implementation processes. Relevant research on various associated policy topics, including The Advocacy Coalition Framework, Governance Theory, and Institutional Theory, may also contribute to improved understanding of the difficulties of implementing evidence in healthcare. Implementation science is at a relatively early stage of development, and advancement of the field would benefit from accounting for knowledge beyond the parameters of the immediate implementation science literature.SummaryThere are many common issues in policy implementation research and implementation science. Research in both fields deals with the challenges of translating intentions into desired changes. Important learning may be derived from several aspects of policy implementation research.

Nyckelord

Policy
Implementation
Top-down
Bottom-up
Determinants
Context
Interdisciplinarity
MEDICINE
MEDICIN

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy