Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-47139" >
Xenotransplantation...
Xenotransplantation as policy problem : Comparing public debate and policies in an international perspective
-
- Griessler, Erich (författare)
- Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria
-
- Beynon-Jones, Siân (författare)
- Science and Technology Studies Unit, University of York,York, UK
-
- Biegelbauer, Peter (författare)
- Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria
-
visa fler...
-
- Brierley, Meaghan (författare)
- Department of Communication and Culture, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
-
- Brown, Nik (författare)
- Science and Technology Studies Unit, University of York,York, UK
-
- Einsiedel, Enda (författare)
- Department of Communication and Culture, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
-
- Hansen, Janus (författare)
- Department of Businessand Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen, Denmark
-
- Hansson, Kristofer (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Avdelningen för etnologi,Institutionen för kulturvetenskaper,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,Division of Ethnology,Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
-
- Jones, Mavis (författare)
- Department of Communication and Culture, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
-
- Kaleja, Ekatarina (författare)
- Centre for Bioethics and Biosafety, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
-
- Loeber, Anne (författare)
- Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,The Netherlands
-
- Lundin, Susanne (författare)
- Lund University,Lunds universitet,Avdelningen för etnologi,Institutionen för kulturvetenskaper,Institutioner,Humanistiska och teologiska fakulteterna,Division of Ethnology,Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences,Departments,Joint Faculties of Humanities and Theology,Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
-
- Pichelstorfer, Anna (författare)
- Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria
-
- Putnina, Aivita (författare)
- Centre for Bioethics and Biosafety, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia
-
- Versteeg, Wytske (författare)
- Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,The Netherlands
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2012-02-23
- 2012
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Xenotransplantation. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0908-665X .- 1399-3089. ; 19:1, s. 15-15
- Relaterad länk:
-
http://dx.doi.org/10...
-
visa fler...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
https://lup.lub.lu.s...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Xenotransplantation research had a hype in the late 1990s and early 2000s and was by then considered a therapeutic option with huge financial potential which was to become clinical standard practice in the near future. Driven by these economic hopes and by the expectation that xenotransplantation might alleviate the so-called organ shortage, governmental actors in different countries but also international organizations (WHO, OECD, Council of Europe) and EU institutions started to think about the implications of xenotransplantation and how to regulate this potential new technology.Xenotransplantation, however, for several reasons was not an uncontroversial technology. In the aftermath of food crises, the GMO conflict and blood scandals connected to HIV and hepatitis, xenotransplantation not only raised serious risk problems – connected to xenozoonosis – there were also basic human rights and animal welfare at stake. These were hotly discussed not only within science but also by different NGOs.In this situation many countries and international organizations carried out Technology Assessment (TA) and participatory Technology Assessment (pTA) procedures which should inform policy-makers about what to do.In my presentation I will compare attempts of TA and pTA on xenotransplantation in different countries and international organization (Austria, Canada, Denmark, Latvia, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, Switzerland OECD, and the European Commission). The paper addresses the following questions: How was xenotransplantation framed as a topic in these countries and institutions? In which settings of TA and pTA was xenotransplantation discussed? Who was included and excluded in policy making? In what way? What was the impact of TA and PTA on policy-making? What can we learn from these examples for negotiating techno-scientific futures in complex societies?The paper draws on an international comparative research project about the impact of citizen participation in knowledge-intensive policy fields (CIT-PART) financed by the European Commission within the 7th Framework Programme (Project Number: SSH-CT-2008-225327). For this research, document analysis of literature and media reports has been carried out. One main source, however, were interviews with people involved in pTA and TA either as participants, researchers, civil servants, politicians, stakeholders and practitioners of TA and pTA. For preliminary results see www.cit-art.at.
Ämnesord
- HUMANIORA -- Annan humaniora -- Etnologi (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Other Humanities -- Ethnology (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- transplantation
- immunology
- xenotransplantation
- policy
- Health and society
- Hälsa och samhälle
- Xenotransplantation
- Technology Assessment
- TA
- participatory Technology Assessment
- pTA
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas
- Av författaren/redakt...
-
Griessler, Erich
-
Beynon-Jones, Si ...
-
Biegelbauer, Pet ...
-
Brierley, Meagha ...
-
Brown, Nik
-
Einsiedel, Enda
-
visa fler...
-
Hansen, Janus
-
Hansson, Kristof ...
-
Jones, Mavis
-
Kaleja, Ekatarin ...
-
Loeber, Anne
-
Lundin, Susanne
-
Pichelstorfer, A ...
-
Putnina, Aivita
-
Versteeg, Wytske
-
visa färre...
- Om ämnet
-
- HUMANIORA
-
HUMANIORA
-
och Annan humaniora
-
och Etnologi
- Artiklar i publikationen
-
Xenotransplantat ...
- Av lärosätet
-
Malmö universitet
-
Lunds universitet