SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mdh-35359"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mdh-35359" > Workplace resources...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance : A systematic review and meta-analysis

Nielsen, Karina (author)
Univ Sheffield, England.
Nielsen, Morten B. (author)
Natl Inst Occupat Hlth, Oslo, Norway.
Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere (author)
Univ East Anglia, England.
show more...
Kansala, Marja (author)
Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Helsinki, Finland.
Saari, Eveliina (author)
Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Helsinki, Finland.
Isaksson, Kerstin, 1952- (author)
Mälardalens högskola,Hälsa och välfärd
show less...
Univ Sheffield, England Natl Inst Occupat Hlth, Oslo, Norway. (creator_code:org_t)
2017-03-24
2017
English.
In: Work & Stress. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0267-8373 .- 1464-5335. ; 31:2, s. 101-120
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Organisations are becoming increasingly aware of the importance of employees in gaining and maintaining competitive advantage. The happy worker-productive worker thesis suggests that workers who experience high levels of well-being also perform well and vice versa; however, organisations need to know how to ensure such happy and productive workers. The present review and meta-analysis identifies workplace resources at the individual, the group, the leader, and the organisational levels that are related to both employee well-being and organisational performance. We examine which types of resources are most important in predicting both employee well-being and performance. We identified 84 quantitative studies published in print and online from 2003 to November 2015. Resources at either of the four levels were related to both employee well-being and performance. We found no significant differences in employee well-being and organisational performance between the four levels of workplace resources, suggesting that interventions may focus on any of these levels. Cross-sectional studies showed stronger relationships with well-being and performance than longitudinal studies. Studies using objective performance ratings provided weaker relationships between resources and performance than self-rated and leader/third-party-rated studies.

Subject headings

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Annan samhällsvetenskap -- Arbetslivsstudier (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Other Social Sciences -- Work Sciences (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Annan hälsovetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Other Health Sciences (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view