SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-93205"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:su-93205" > Peer Portal :

Peer Portal : Quality Enhancement in Thesis Writing Using Self-Managed Peer Review on a Mass Scale

Aghaee, Naghmeh (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Institutionen för data- och systemvetenskap
Hansson, Henrik (författare)
Stockholms universitet,Institutionen för data- och systemvetenskap
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013-02-13
2013
Engelska.
Ingår i: International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. - : Athabasca University Press. - 1492-3831. ; 14:1, s. 186-203
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This paper describes a specially developed online peer-review system, the Peer Portal, and the first results of its use for quality enhancement of bachelor's and master's thesis manuscripts. The peer-review system is completely student driven and therefore saves time for supervisors and creates a direct interaction between students without interference from supervisors. The purpose is to improve thesis manuscript quality, and thereby use supervisor time more efficiently, since peers review basic aspects of the manuscripts and give constructive suggestions for improvements. The process was initiated in 2012, and, in total, 260 peer reviews were completed between 1st January and 15th May, 2012. All peer reviews for this period have been analyzed with the help of content analysis. The purpose of analysis is to assess the quality of the students work. The results are categorized in four groups: 1) excellent (18.1%), 2) good (22.7%), 3) fragmented (18.5%), and 4) poor (40.7%). The overall result shows that almost 40% of the students produced excellent or good peer reviews and almost as many produced poor peer reviews. The result shows that the quality varies considerably. Explanations of these quality variations need further study. However, alternative hypotheses followed by some strategic suggestions are discussed in this study. Finally, a way forward in terms of improving peer reviews is outlined: 1) development of a peer wizard system and 2) rating of received peer reviews based on the quality categories created in this study. A Peer Portal version 2.0 is suggested, which will eliminate the fragmented and poor quality peer reviews, but still keep this review system student driven and ensure autonomous learning.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Utbildningsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Educational Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Autonomous learning
online collaboration
computer-mediated communication
SciPro
peer review
peer portal
thesis process
data- och systemvetenskap
Computer and Systems Sciences

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Aghaee, Naghmeh
Hansson, Henrik
Om ämnet
NATURVETENSKAP
NATURVETENSKAP
och Data och informa ...
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Utbildningsveten ...
Artiklar i publikationen
International Re ...
Av lärosätet
Stockholms universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy