SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-150647"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-150647" > Sniff nasal inspira...

Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis : Relevance of the methodology for respiratory function evaluation

Pinto, Susana (författare)
Umeå universitet,Klinisk neurovetenskap,Institute of Physiology, Institute of Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
de Carvalho, Mamede (författare)
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2018
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: Clinical neurology and neurosurgery (Dutch-Flemish ed. Print). - : Elsevier. - 0303-8467 .- 1872-6968. ; 171, s. 42-45
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives: We investigated two different methodological approaches for determining nasal inspiratory pressure during a sniff (SNIP) in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS). Patients and Methods: We included 37 ALS patients and 11 controls. SNIP was measured in the sitting position, performed in each nostril with (SNIPocclud) and without (SNIPopen) closing the contralateral nostril. The best of 3 consistent results was considered for analyses. Patients were also assessed with MIP and the revised functional ALS rating scale (ALSFRS-R). Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon test and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient with Bonferroni correction were applied. Coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated. Results: SNIP was significantly lower in patients than controls, either for SNIPopen (p = 0.011) or SNIPocclud (p = 0.002). SNIPopen values were significantly lower both in ALS patients and controls than SNIPocclud (p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively). SNIPopen CV was 8.14% and 8.51%, while SNIPocclud CV was 4.98% and 6.37%, respectively for controls and patients. SNIPopen and SNIPocclud were strongly correlated in both groups (r = 0.761 for controls; r = 0.768 for patients). In ALS, both methods were moderately correlated with MIP (respectively r = 0.525, p = 0.006 and r = 0.685, p < 0.001) and the respiratory subscore of ALSFRS-R (respectively r = 0.525, p = 0.001 and r = 0.64, p < 0.001). Although bulbar and spinal onset patients presented no differences for SNIPopen (p = 0.157), significant differences were found for SNIPocclud (p = 0.018). Conclusion: SNIPocclud should be considered when evaluating ALS patients as its values present lower variability and favor longer follow-up.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Neurologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Neurology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Respiratory function
SNIP
Methodology
Variability
Reliability

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Pinto, Susana
de Carvalho, Mam ...
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
och Neurologi
Artiklar i publikationen
Clinical neurolo ...
Av lärosätet
Umeå universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy