SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-208117"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-208117" > Systematic review o...

Systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health

Messiha, Katrina (författare)
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Chinapaw, Mai J. M. (författare)
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ket, Hans C. F. F. (författare)
Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
visa fler...
An, Qingfan, 1997- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering
Anand-Kumar, Vinayak (författare)
Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Longworth, Giuliana R. (författare)
Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
Chastin, Sebastien (författare)
School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK; Department of Movement and Sports Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Altenburg, Teatske M. (författare)
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Oxford University Press, 2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Public Health. - : Oxford University Press. - 1741-3842 .- 1741-3850. ; 45:3, s. 723-737
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research.Methods: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed.Results: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating.Conclusion: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

co-creation
co-design
co-production
public health
theoretical framework
theory

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy