SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-33714"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-33714" > The economic value ...

The economic value of recreational fisheries in Nordic countries

Toivonen, A. -L. (författare)
Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland
Roth, E. (författare)
Department of Environmental and Business Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Esbjerg, Denmark
Navrud, S. (författare)
Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Agricultural University of Norway, Ås, Norway
visa fler...
Gudbergsson, G. (författare)
Institute of Freshwater Fisheries, Reykjavik, Iceland
Appelblad, H., 1965- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Kulturgeografiska institutionen
Bengtsson, B. (författare)
National Board of Fisheries, Gothenburg, Sweden
Tuunainen, P. (författare)
Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute, Helsinki, Finland
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Oxford : Blackwell Publishing, 2004
2004
Engelska.
Ingår i: Fisheries Management and Ecology. - Oxford : Blackwell Publishing. - 0969-997X .- 1365-2400. ; 11:1, s. 1-14
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Recreational fishing, wether free or at cost, has an economic value. This value was measured in five Nordic countries based on a contingent valuation mail survey. Regression models were used to identify demographic characteristics, types of fishing patterns and differences in the countries' mangement regimes that can explain both actual fishing expenditure and willingness to pay for the non-market benefits by persons participating in fishing or enjoying the benefits derived by it. Net benefit, i.e. willingness to pay over and above actual expenditure was highest amongst those fishing. In Denmark, the small number of generalist fishermen get the highest benefit. In Finland results are mixed but sports fishermen benefit on average even more than generalists. Urban sports fishing raises the highest benefit in Iceland while in Norway the benefit is more equally spread, with occasional anglers and woman reaping the least. In Sweden the mean benefit is the lowest in the Nordic countries but evenly distributed among categories of fishermen. In the Nordic countries combined, nationality explains willingness to pay as being Norwegian or Finnish increases benefit and being Icelandic reduces it. The non-use value of recreational fisheries was elicited through posing questions on willingness to pay for the preservation of the existence of current fish stocks and current quality of recreational fishing to persons participating in fishing or enjoying the benefits derived from it. For those not fishing or people in general, the power of the models to explain willingness to pay for the existence of recreational fisheries was very weak. The benefit, i.e. willingness to pay, is higher if somebody in the houshold fishes. Educated, young, urban, well-off citizens also put value on the non-use of the resource.

Nyckelord

contingent valuation
economic value
general linear models
Nordic countries
recreational fishing

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy