SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-317715"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-317715" > Degarelix monothera...

Degarelix monotherapy compared with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists plus anti-androgen flare protection in advanced prostate cancer : an analysis of two randomized controlled trials

Iversen, Peter (författare)
Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Copenhagen Prostate Canc Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Damber, Jan-Erik, 1949 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för urologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Urology
Malmberg, Anders (författare)
Ferring Pharmaceut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
visa fler...
Persson, Bo-Eric (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper,Lakarhuset & Uppsala Univ, Lakarhuset Urol, St Persgatan 17,5, SE-75320 Uppsala, Sweden.
Klotz, Laurence (författare)
Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Div Urol, Toronto, ON, Canada.
visa färre...
Univ Copenhagen, Rigshosp, Copenhagen Prostate Canc Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för urologi (creator_code:org_t)
2015-12-16
2016
Engelska.
Ingår i: THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN UROLOGY. - : SAGE Publications. - 1756-2872 .- 1756-2880. ; 8:2, s. 75-82
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess differences in efficacy outcomes between luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist plus antiandrogen (AA) flare protection and monotherapy with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist degarelix in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: Data from 1455 patients were pooled from two prospective, phase III randomized 1-year clinical trials of degarelix versus LHRH agonist with or without AA. The AA bicalutamide was administered at the investigator's discretion. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model and a conditional logistic regression model was used for a case-control analysis of odds ratios (ORs). Results: Patients received degarelix monotherapy (n = 972) or LHRH agonist (n = 483) of whom 57 also received AA. Overall, prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival (PSA PFS) was improved with degarelix versus LHRH agonist + AA (Cox proportional hazards regression model-adjusted HR for PSA PFS failure was 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.97, p = 0.038]). To compensate for a higher proportion of patients with metastases, Gleason score 7-10, and PSA >20 ng/ml in the LHRH agonist + AA group, a case-control analysis using a conditional logistic regression model was utilized. This resulted in an OR for PSA PFS of 0.42 (95% CI 0.20-0.89; p = 0.023) in the overall population, and 0.35 (95% CI 0.13-0.96; p = 0.042) in patients with PSA >50 ng/ml at baseline, when treated with degarelix versus LHRH agonists + AA. There were a small number of deaths, 1.9% with degarelix and 7% with LHRH agonists + AA (case-control analysis OR = 0.37; p = 0.085). Conclusions: Degarelix monotherapy produced a more favorable effect on PSA PFS outcomes than a LHRH agonist + AA flare protection therapy in patients with prostate cancer when a case-control analysis was used to compensate for differences between treatment groups.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Urologi och njurmedicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Urology and Nephrology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

anti-androgen
degarelix
luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist
prostate cancer
testosterone flare

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy