Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:uu-365685" >
A systematic litera...
A systematic literature review comparing methods for the measurement of patient persistence and adherence
-
- Forbes, Carol A. (författare)
- Kleijnen Systemat Reviews Ltd, York, N Yorkshire, England
-
- Deshpande, Sohan (författare)
- Kleijnen Systemat Reviews Ltd, York, N Yorkshire, England
-
- Sorio-Vilela, Francesc (författare)
- Amgen Europe GmbH, Global Hlth Econ, Zug, Switzerland
-
visa fler...
-
- Kutikova, Lucie (författare)
- Amgen Europe GmbH, Global Hlth Econ, Zug, Switzerland
-
- Duffy, Steven (författare)
- Kleijnen Systemat Reviews Ltd, York, N Yorkshire, England
-
- Gouni-Berthold, Ioanna (författare)
- Univ Cologne, Polyclin Endocrinol Diabet & Prevent Med, Cologne, Germany
-
- Hagström, Emil (författare)
- Uppsala universitet,Kardiologi,Uppsala kliniska forskningscentrum (UCR)
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2018-06-04
- 2018
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Current Medical Research and Opinion. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 0300-7995 .- 1473-4877. ; 34:9, s. 1613-1625
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa fler...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Objectives: A systematic literature review was conducted comparing different approaches estimating persistence and adherence in chronic diseases with polypharmacy of oral and subcutaneous treatments. Methods: This work followed published guidance on performing systematic reviews. Twelve electronic databases and grey literature sources were used to identify studies and guidelines for persistence and adherence of oral and subcutaneous therapies in hypercholesterolemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis. Outcomes of interest of each persistence and adherence data collection and calculation method included pros: accurate, easy to use, inexpensive; and cons: inaccurate, difficult to use, expensive. Results: A total of 4158 records were retrieved up to March 2017. We included 16 observational studies, 5 systematic reviews and 7 guidelines, in patients with hypercholesterolemia (n=8), type 2 diabetes (n=4), hypertension (n=2), rheumatoid arthritis (n=1) and mixed patient populations (n=13). Pharmacy and medical records offer an accurate, easy and inexpensive data collection method. Pill count, medication event monitoring systems (MEMs), self-report questionnaires and observer report are easy to use. MEMS and biochemical monitoring tests can be expensive. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was recommended as a gold standard calculation method for long-term treatments. PDC avoids use of days' supply in calculation, hence is more accurate compared to medication possession ratio (MPR) to assess adherence to treatments in chronic diseases. Conclusions: Decisions on what method to use should be based on considerations of the route of medication administration, the resources available, setting and aim of the assessment. Combining different methods may provide wider insights into adherence and persistence, including patient behavior.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Samhällsfarmaci och klinisk farmaci (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Basic Medicine -- Social and Clinical Pharmacy (hsv//eng)
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Farmaceutiska vetenskaper (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Basic Medicine -- Pharmaceutical Sciences (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Cardiovascular diseases
- chronic disease
- adherence
- persistence
- methodology
- systematic review
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- for (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas