SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/170899"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/170899" > European Aid Coordi...

European Aid Coordination in Africa: Is the Commission Calling the Tune?

Delputte, Sarah (författare)
Söderbaum, Fredrik, 1968 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Centrum för globalisering och utveckling (GCGD),Institutionen för globala studier,Gothenburg Centre for Globalization and Development (GCGD),School of Global Studies
 (creator_code:org_t)
Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan, 2012
2012
Engelska.
Ingår i: Stefan Gänzle, Davina Makhan & Sven Grimm (eds.), The European Union and Global Development: An ‘Enlightened Superpower’ in the Making?. - Basingstoke : Palgrave Macmillan. - 9780230319677 ; , s. 37-56
  • Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Although there is much rhetoric about that the EU is the world’s biggest aid player, its role as an “actor” in the field of development is ambiguous and sometimes even counterproductive. While, on the one hand, the EU plays a instrumental role in the international policy discussion in multilateral fora and on global development policy (e.g. Paris Agenda on Aid Effectiveness, Millennium Development Goals, poverty reduction programmes, budget support etc.), on the other hand, the EU often fails to act as one ‘on the ground’ in the developing countries. In fact, in contrast to its official policy the EU is not a unified actor or a functioning aid coordination mechanism, at least when focus is placed on development cooperation in Africa. In practice the European Commission often acts as “the 28th” member state, conducting its own aid policies, rather than serving as the hub for donor coordination within the EU as a whole. The much talked about European Consensus on Development Policy is, as one donor official in an EU member state put it, “ice thin.” Although a functionalist perspective underpins much of the policy debate and official proclamations of how EU policy should look, it does not, however, explain the general lack of European donor coordination occurring on the ground, where it is really needed. This chapter shows that the EU’s largely ineffective coordination strategies in Africa have not been primarily driven by a concern to increase aid effectiveness according to a functional logic, but are instead driven by two alternative explanations, namely ‘identity’ and ‘bureaucratic politics’. When policies are driven by identity and bureaucratic politics rather than by functional objectives, the opportunities for compromise and for reaching common ground are reduced.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap -- Statsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science -- Political Science (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Statsvetenskap -- Globaliseringsstudier (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Political Science -- Globalisation Studies (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
kap (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Delputte, Sarah
Söderbaum, Fredr ...
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Statsvetenskap
och Statsvetenskap
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Statsvetenskap
och Globaliseringsst ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Stefan Gänzle, D ...
Av lärosätet
Göteborgs universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy