SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/183240"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/183240" > Methodological qual...

Methodological quality in clinical trials and bibliometric indicators: no evidence of correlations

Akcan, D. (författare)
Swedish Council Health Technology Assessment SBU, Sweden
Axelsson, S. (författare)
Swedish Council Health Technology Assessment SBU, Sweden
Bergh, Christina, 1953 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Gothenburg University, Sweden Sahlgrens University Hospital, Sweden
visa fler...
Davidson, Thomas (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys,Hälsouniversitetet
Rosen, M. (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013-01-29
2013
Engelska.
Ingår i: Scientometrics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0138-9130 .- 1588-2861. ; 96:1, s. 297-303
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Citation frequencies and journal impact factors (JIFs) are being used more and more to assess the quality of research and allocate research resources. If these bibliometric indicators are not an adequate predictor of research quality, there could be severe negative consequences for research. To analyse to which extent citation frequencies and journal impact factors correlate with the methodological quality of clinical research articles included in an SBU systematic review of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery. All 212 eligible original articles were extracted from the SBU systematic review "Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery" and categorized according to their methodological rigourness as high, moderate or low quality articles. Median of citation frequencies and JIFs were compared between the methodological quality groups using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test. An in-depth study of low-quality studies with higher citation frequencies/JIFs was also conducted. No significant differences were found in median citation frequencies (p = 0.453) or JIFs (p = 0.185) between the three quality groups. Studies that had high citation frequencies/JIFs but were assessed as low-quality lacked control groups, had high dropout rates or low internal validity. This study of antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery does not support the hypothesis that bibliometric indicators are a valid instrument for assessing methodological quality in clinical trials. This is a worrying observation, since bibliometric indicators have a major influence on research funding. However, further studies in other areas are needed.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap -- Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Media and Communications -- Information Studies (hsv//eng)
NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Datavetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Computer Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Bibliometric analysis
Citations
Impact factor
Study quality
HTA
journal-impact-factor
medical literature
citation rates
users guides
publication
prevention
articles
validity
therapy
history
Bibliometric analysis; Citations; Impact factor; Study quality; HTA
MEDICINE

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy