SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/203445"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/203445" > Immediate nonfuncti...

Immediate nonfunctional versus immediate functional loading and dental implant failure rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chrcanovic, Bruno (författare)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Albrektsson, Tomas, 1945 (författare)
Malmö högskola,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för biomaterialvetenskap,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Biomaterials,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Wennerberg, Ann, 1955 (författare)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2014
2014
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Dentistry. - : Elsevier BV. - 0300-5712 .- 1879-176X. ; 42:9, s. 1052-1059
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives: The purpose of the present review was to test the null hypothesis of no difference in the implant failure rates, postoperative infection, and marginal bone loss for patients being rehabilitated using dental implants with immediate nonfunctional loading (INFL) compared to immediate functional loading (IFL), against the alternative hypothesis of a difference. Methods: An electronic search without time or language restrictions was undertaken in March 2014. Eligibility criteria included clinical human studies, either randomized or not. The estimates of relative effect were expressed in risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) in millimeters. Results: 1059 studies were identified and 11 studies were included, of which 7 were of high risk of bias, whereas four studies were of low risk of bias. The results showed that the procedure used (nonfunctional vs. functional) did not significantly affect the implant failure rates (P = 0.70), with a RR of 0.87 (95% CI 0.44-1.75). The wide CI demonstrates uncertainty about the effect size. The analysis of postoperative infection was not possible due to lack of data. No apparent significant effects of non-occlusal loading on the marginal bone loss (MD 0.01 mm, 95% CI -0.04-0.06; P = 0.74) were observed. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that the differences in occlusal loading between INFL and IFL might not affect the survival of these dental implants and that there is no apparent significant effect on the marginal bone loss. Clinical Significance: There has been a controversy concerning whether dental implants should be subjected to immediate functional or nonfunctional loading. As the philosophies of treatment may alter over time, a periodic review of the different concepts is necessary to refine techniques and eliminate unnecessary procedures. This would form a basis for optimum treatment. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinsk bioteknologi -- Biomaterialvetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Medical Biotechnology -- Biomaterials Science (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Dental implants
Immediate loading
Nonfunctional loading
Functional loading
Implant failure rate
TRADITIONAL HEALING PERIODS
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
FOLLOW-UP
TITANIUM IMPLANTS
RESTORATION
INTERFACE
SURFACES
OCCLUSAL
Dentistry
Oral Surgery & Medicine
Dental implants

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy