SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/285694"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/285694" > Influence of variat...

Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report.

Ivanoff, Carl-Johan (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Odontologiska institutionen,Institute of Odontology
Gröndahl, Kerstin, 1948 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Odontologiska institutionen, Avdelningen för oral och maxillofacial radiologi,Institute of Odontology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
Sennerby, Lars, 1960 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Odontologiska institutionen,Institute of Odontology
visa fler...
Lekholm, Ulf, 1944 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Odontologiska institutionen, Avdelningen för oral och maxillofacial kirurgi,Institute of Odontology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
1999
1999
Engelska.
Ingår i: The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. - 0882-2786. ; 14:2, s. 173-80
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Sixty-seven patients ranging in age from 16 to 86 years were included in this 3- to 5-year retrospective report focusing on implant survival and marginal bone remodeling in relation to implant diameter. A total of 299 Brånemark implants (3.75-mm diameter: 141; 4.0-mm diameter: 61; 5.0-mm diameter: 97) were placed in 16 completely and 51 partially edentulous arches. Seven of the 141 implants in the 3.75-mm-diameter group failed (5%). The corresponding value for the 4.0-mm-wide implants was 2 of 61 (3%). The highest failure rate, 18% (17/97), was seen for the 5.0-mm-diameter implants. The least favorable cumulative survival rates were seen in mandibles after 5 years and involving 4.0-mm- and 5.0-mm-diameter implants (84.8% and 73.0%, respectively). The marginal bone loss was generally low over the 5-year period. When the data were evaluated by the Cox regression analysis, a relationship was found between implant failure and implant diameter (P < .05), with a higher failure rate for the 5.0-mm-diameter implant. However, no relationship could be seen between implant failure and jaw type, or bone quality and quantity (P > .05). Neither was any relationship seen between marginal bone loss and bone quality and quantity, implant diameter, or jaw type when tested by multiple linear regression analysis (P > .05). A learning curve, poor bone quality, and changed implant design were suggested as possible reasons for the less positive outcome seen for the 5.0-mm-diameter implant. The fact that this implant was often used as a rescue implant when the standard ones were not considered suitable or did not reach initial stability was another plausible explanation.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged
80 and over
Alveolar Bone Loss
etiology
Bone Density
Dental Implantation
Endosseous
Dental Implants
adverse effects
Dental Prosthesis Design
Dental Restoration Failure
Female
Humans
Life Tables
Linear Models
Male
Middle Aged
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy