SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/306801"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/306801" > Author guidelines f...

Author guidelines for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Prill, R. (författare)
Karlsson, Jon, 1953 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för ortopedi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics
Ayeni, O. R. (författare)
visa fler...
Becker, R. (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-06-28
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 29, s. 2739-2744
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This article is a guidance how to write systematic reviews (SR's) and meta-analyses (MA) in orthopaedics and which aspects to focus on for transparency, systematicity and readability. Both SR and MA summarise and synthesise the best evidence available on a specific topic. This requires a systematic, structured and transparent process of analysis. The title should be concise, indicate type of review and ideally report the most important finding. Next, the structured abstract (no more than 350 words) should also raise key points and report the overall level of evidence. A relevant clinical question must be defined before the literature search is started. Methodological details such as databases searched, the exact search strategy (including time frame), inclusion/exclusion criteria, method of literature appraisal and statistical analysis must be described briefly. The primary and secondary outcomes should be mentioned. SR's be pre-registered before data extraction, to ensure transparency and the reduction of risk of bias. If registered, registration number should be stated in the abstract and the funding sources. A clear summary of the findings is important including the number of identified studies (depicted in a flowchart) and for meta-analyses a forest plot. The results of the literature appraisal and statistical analyses should be reported precisely. Subsequently, a general interpretation of findings and their significance and relevance to clinical practice should be provided. Clinical implications from the analysis should be drawn carefully and further research questions should be addressed. Finally, a conclusion, based solely on the results of the study is a necessity. Up to ten keywords are requested representing the main content of the article. Most applicable keywords should facilitate finding the manuscript in the databases and therefor considered carefully.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper -- Andra medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Basic Medicine -- Other Basic Medicine (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Evidence synthesis
Guidelines
Reporting standards
Level of evidence
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
Literature review
Instructions for
authors
Orthopedics
Sport Sciences
Surgery

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Prill, R.
Karlsson, Jon, 1 ...
Ayeni, O. R.
Becker, R.
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Medicinska och f ...
och Andra medicinska ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Knee Surgery Spo ...
Av lärosätet
Göteborgs universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy