SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/328403"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/328403" > Electronic patient-...

Electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical kidney practice (ePRO Kidney): a process evaluation of educational support for clinicians

Schick-Makaroff, K. (författare)
Klarenbach, S. (författare)
Kwon, J. Y. (författare)
visa fler...
Cohen, S. R. (författare)
Czupryn, J. (författare)
Lee, L. R. T. (författare)
Pauly, R. (författare)
MacRae, J. M. (författare)
Forde, B. (författare)
Sawatzky, Richard (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för vårdvetenskap och hälsa,Institute of Health and Care Sciences
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Therapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease. - 2040-6223. ; 14
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly mandated in kidney care to incorporate patients' perspectives.Objectives: We assessed whether educational support for clinicians using electronic (e)PROs could enhance person-centered care. Design: A process evaluation, using a mixed methods longitudinal comparative concurrent design was undertaken of educational support to clinicians on routine use of ePROs. In two urban home dialysis clinics in Alberta, Canada, patients completed ePROs. At the implementation site, clinicians were provided with ePROs and clinician-oriented education via voluntary workshops. At the non-implementation site, neither were provided. Person-centered care was measured using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care-20 (PACIC-20).Methods: Longitudinal structural equation models (SEMs) compared change in overall PACIC scores. The interpretive description approach, using thematic analysis of qualitative data, further evaluated processes of implementation.Results: Data were collected from questionnaires completed by 543 patients, 4 workshops, 15 focus groups, and 37 interviews. There was no overall difference in person-centered care throughout the study, including after delivery of workshops. The longitudinal SEMs revealed substantial individual-level variability in overall PACIC trajectories. However, there was no improvement at the implementation site and no difference between the sites during both the pre-and post-workshop periods. Similar results were obtained for each PACIC domain. Qualitative analysis provided insights into why there was no substantial difference between sites: (1) clinicians wanted to see kidney symptoms, not quality of life, (2) workshops were tailored to clinicians' educational needs, not patients' needs, and (3) variable use of ePRO data by clinicians.Conclusion: Training clinicians on use of ePROs is complex and likely only part of what is required to enhance person-centered care.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

electronic patient-reported outcome
health services
home hemodialysis
peritoneal dialysis
person-centered care
interviews
checklist
validity
care
Pharmacology & Pharmacy

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy