SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/332575"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/332575" > Pain as bad as you ...

Pain as bad as you can imagine or extremely severe pain? A randomized controlled trial comparing two pain scale anchors

Tin, Amy L. (författare)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Austria, Mia (författare)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Ogbennaya, Gabriel (författare)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
visa fler...
Chimonas, Susan (författare)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Andréll, Paulin, 1978 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för anestesiologi och intensivvård,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care,Sahlgrenska Academy,Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Atkinson, Thomas M. (författare)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Vickers, Andrew J. (författare)
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
Carlsson, Sigrid V. (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för urologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Urology,Institutionen för translationell medicin,Medicinska fakulteten,Urologisk cancerforskning, Malmö,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,LUCC: Lunds universitets cancercentrum,Övriga starka forskningsmiljöer,Department of Translational Medicine,Faculty of Medicine,Urological cancer, Malmö,Lund University Research Groups,LUCC: Lund University Cancer Centre,Other Strong Research Environments,Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,Sahlgrenska Academy
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes. - 2509-8020. ; 7:1
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: A common method of pain assessment is the numerical rating scale, where patients are asked to rate their pain on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 is “no pain” and 10 is “pain as bad as you can imagine”. We hypothesize such language is suboptimal as it involves a test of a cognitive skill, imagination, in the assessment of symptom severity. Methods: We used a large-scale online research registry, ResearchMatch, to conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the distributions of pain scores of two different pain scale anchors. We recruited adults located in the United States who reported a chronic pain problem (> 3 months) and were currently in pain. Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive pain assessment based on a modified Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), where the anchor for a score of 10 was either “extremely severe pain”, or the original BPI, with the anchor “pain as bad as you can imagine”. Participants in both groups also answered additional questions about pain, other symptomatology and creativity. Results: Data were obtained from 405 participants for the modified and 424 for the original BPI. Distribution of responses to pain questions were similar between groups (all p-values ≥ 0.12). We did not see evidence that the relationship between pain score and the anchor text differed based on self-perceived creativity (all interaction p-values ≥ 0.2). However, in the key analysis, correlations between current pain assessments and known correlates (fatigue, anxiety, depression, current pain compared to a typical day, pain compared to other people) were stronger for “extreme” vs. “imaginable” anchor text (p = 0.005). Conclusion: Pain rating scales should utilize the modified anchor text “extremely severe pain” instead of “pain as bad as you can imagine”. Further research should explore the effects of anchors for other symptoms.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Numeric rating scale
Pain
Patient-reported outcomes
Validity

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy