SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/55870"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:gup.ub.gu.se/55870" > Cardiovascular morb...

Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertensive patients with lower versus higher risk: a LIFE substudy

Franklin, S. S. (författare)
Wachtell, K. (författare)
Papademetriou, V. (författare)
visa fler...
Olsen, M. H. (författare)
Devereux, R. B. (författare)
Fyhrquist, F. (författare)
Ibsen, H. (författare)
Kjeldsen, S. E. (författare)
Dahlöf, Björn, 1953 (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Hjärt-kärlinstitutionen,Cardiovascular Institute
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2005
2005
Engelska.
Ingår i: Hypertension. - 1524-4563. ; 46:3, s. 492-9
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • We hypothesized that losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing cardiovascular events in a lower-risk group (LRG) versus a higher-risk group (HRG) of patients in a Losartan Intervention For Endpoint reduction (LIFE) substudy, independently of blood pressure (BP) reduction. In a post hoc analysis, we designated 4282 patients as LRG on the basis of: (1) no previous cardiovascular disease (coronary, cerebral, peripheral vascular disease); (2) no diabetes; (3) no isolated systolic hypertension; and (4) inclusion of the lowest 3 quartiles of electrocardiographically documented left ventricular hypertrophy. The HRG consisted of 4911 remaining patients who did not qualify for the LRG. In the LRG, losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing stroke: hazard ratio (HR), 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.98); new-onset diabetes (HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.93]; and new-onset atrial fibrillation: HR, 0.69 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.92), all P<0.05 but not composite end points or cardiovascular mortality (both P=NS). In the HRG, losartan was superior to atenolol in reducing composite end points: HR, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.94), P<0.01; cardiovascular mortality: HR, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95), P<0.05; stroke: HR, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92), P<0.01; new-onset diabetes: HR, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60 to 0.96), P<0.05; and new-onset atrial fibrillation: HR, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58 to 88), P<0.05. Test for interaction of treatment with LRG versus HRG was not significant for composite end point, stroke, or atrial fibrillation, but was for cardiovascular mortality (P=0.018). Achieved systolic BP reduction favored losartan over atenolol by -1.8 mm Hg in LRG (P=NS) and -0.7 mm Hg (P=0.001) in HRG, but no significant differences occurred in diastolic or mean BP in either group. In conclusion, losartan compared with atenolol reduces the risk of stroke, new-onset diabetes, and new-onset atrial fibrillation in the LRG and the HRG.

Nyckelord

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/*therapeutic use
Aged
80 and over
Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers/therapeutic use
Animals
Atenolol/*therapeutic use
Atrial Fibrillation/prevention & control
Blood Pressure/*drug effects
Cardiovascular Diseases/*complications/*mortality
Cerebrovascular Accident/prevention & control
Diabetes Mellitus/prevention & control
Female
Humans
Hypertension/*complications/drug therapy/physiopathology
Losartan/*therapeutic use
Male
Middle Aged
Randomized Controlled Trials
Risk

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy