SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:cc2a8317-4a1b-4fff-a50b-77a821172a83"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:cc2a8317-4a1b-4fff-a50b-77a821172a83" > Balancing innovatio...

Balancing innovation, ‘ordre public’ and morality in human germline editing : A call for more nuanced approaches in patent law

Matthews, Duncan (författare)
Queen Mary University
Minssen, Timo (författare)
University of Copenhagen
Nordberg, Ana (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Juridiska institutionen,Juridiska fakulteten,Health Law,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Mänskliga rättigheter,Affärsrättsligt centrum vid Lunds Universitet, ACLU,Department of Law,Faculty of Law,Lund University Research Groups,Human Rights Law,Lund University Centre for Business Law (Swedish abbr: ACLU)
 (creator_code:org_t)
Brill, 2022
2022
Engelska 27 s.
Ingår i: European Journal of Health Law. - : Brill. - 0929-0273 .- 1571-8093. ; 29:3-5, s. 562-588
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This article analyses the role that ‘ordre public’ and morality exceptions can play in the granting of patents on inventions in the field of human germline editing and the consequences of this policy option. In order to provide the context for such an analysis, the article will, first, provide an overview of the current patent landscape for relevant genome editing technologies, drawing attention to recent patent disputes and, second, examine ‘ordre public’ and morality exceptions under patent law in international, national and regional law, and the implications for innovation and access to novel treatments. The article argues that patent exceptions should not be used as a blunt policy instrument, nor interpreted in a way that is contrary to the patent system's overall objectives. The ‘ordre public’ and morality based exceptions in the context of human germline editing should not be interpreted and applied in a way which results in outcomes counterproductive to the goal of balancing innovation with the protection of societal higher normative values. Instead, the application of the exception should be based on a sound understanding of both the underlying science as well as the broader ethical, social, and legal implications, thus enabling case-by-case decisions that provide the basis for patent claim amendments and nuanced purpose-bound protection. Further analysis and debate as to the role that such flexibilities can play in the context of genome editing technologies is therefore both necessary and desirable, and can be facilitated in the ways set out in this article.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Juridik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Law (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Jurisprudence
Patent law
Genome editing
Genome editing governance
Genome editing patents
CRISPR-Cas
Law, technology & ethics
Morality exception
Allmän rättslära
Patentlag

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Matthews, Duncan
Minssen, Timo
Nordberg, Ana
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Juridik
Artiklar i publikationen
European Journal ...
Av lärosätet
Lunds universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy