SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:d1277e36-f617-469b-a4f1-91961abeeb34"
 

Sökning: id:"swepub:oai:lup.lub.lu.se:d1277e36-f617-469b-a4f1-91961abeeb34" > Regulating Germline...

Regulating Germline Editing in Assisted Reproductive Technology : An EU Cross-disciplinary Perspective

Nordberg, Ana (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Juridiska institutionen,Juridiska fakulteten,Health Law,Forskargrupper vid Lunds universitet,Mänskliga rättigheter,Department of Law,Faculty of Law,Lund University Research Groups,Human Rights Law
Minssen, Timo (författare)
University of Copenhagen
Feeney, Oliver (författare)
National University of Ireland Galway
visa fler...
de Miguel Beiren, Inigo (författare)
University of the Basque Country
Galvani, Lucia (författare)
Fondazione Bruno Kessler (FBK)
Wartiovaara, Kirmo (författare)
Helsinki University Central Hospital
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019-12-26
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: Bioethics. - : Wiley. - 0269-9702 .- 1467-8519. ; 34:1, s. 16-32
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Potential applications of genome editing in assisted reproductive technology (ART) raise a vast array of strong opinions, emotional reactions and divergent perceptions. Acknowledging the need for caution and respecting such reactions, we observe that at least some are based on either a misunderstanding of the science or misconceptions about the content and flexibility of the existing legal frameworks. Combining medical, legal and ethical expertise, we present and discuss regulatory responses at the national, European and international levels. The discussion has a EU starting point and is meant as a contribute to the general international regulatory debate. Overall, this paper concludes that gene editing technologies should not be regulated autonomously. Rather, potential uses should be regulated under general, existing frameworks and where applicable by reference to sufficiently equivalent technologies and techniques already subject to specific regulation. To be clear, we do not argue for the hasty introduction of gene editing as a reproductive treatment option in the immediate future. We call for caution with regard to overreaching moratoria and prohibitions which will also affect basic research. We recommend flexible regulations that allow for further responsible research into the potential development of the technology. We call for an open and inclusive debate and argue that scientific communication should claim a more prominent role to counter the danger of widespread misinformation. A high level of transparency and accuracy should guide scientific communication while simultaneously global-scale responsibility and governance should be fostered by promoting cross-disciplinary thinking and multi-level stakeholder involvement in legal and regulatory processes.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Juridik (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Law (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Assisted Reproduction Technology
Gene editing
Germ line modifications
Civil law
Privaträtt

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Bioethics (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Nordberg, Ana
Minssen, Timo
Feeney, Oliver
de Miguel Beiren ...
Galvani, Lucia
Wartiovaara, Kir ...
Om ämnet
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Juridik
Artiklar i publikationen
Bioethics
Av lärosätet
Lunds universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy